Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

Acquitted “Bundy Defendants” Seek Justice and Over $60 Million in Damages

Lovelien and Stewart were charged for allegedly conspiring with Cliven Bundy and his sons to threaten federal agents at gunpoint during the armed standoff.

Acquitted "Bundy Defendants" Seek Justice and Over $60 Million in Damages

Acquitted “Bundy Defendants” Hit Back at Federal Prosecutors, FBI and BLM

Plaintiffs Seek Justice and Over $60 Million in Damages

(Washington, D.C., August 9, 2018). Today, Larry Klayman announced the filing of a $60 million dollar lawsuit against federal prosecutors Steven Myhre, Daniel Schiess and Nadia Ahmed of the U.S. Attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada, as well as former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) Neil Kornze, the FBI, and BLM, who are alleged to have entrapped, manufactured, and used false evidence to indict peaceful protesters Rick Lovelien and Steven Stewart in the criminal prosecutions stemming from the 2014 successful standoff at the Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada.

Lovelien and Stewart were charged for allegedly conspiring with Cliven Bundy and his sons to threaten federal agents at gunpoint during the armed standoff. The plaintiffs’ complaint, which was filed in D.C. federal court (case no. 18-cv-01869) alleges that the prosecutors, without any evidence, falsely entrapped, charged and then maliciously prosecuted Lovelien and Stewart for obstruction of justice, along with several other demonstrably false charges.

Lovelien and Stewart were then denied bail by a Senator Harry Reid and Obama-appointed federal Judge Gloria Navarro and were left to “rot” in prison for two years before they were finally tried. During this time, the plaintiffs allegedly suffered great emotional distress, physical harm, and financial damage. The complaint also seeks punitive damages.

The jury ultimately acquitted both Lovelien and Stewart based on the complete lack of any evidence that they had committed any crime, much less conspired with Cliven Bundy and his sons.

Later, at the subsequent trial of Cliven Bundy and his sons, which not coincidentally resulted in a dismissal of their indictment, it was also revealed that the prosecutors had hidden exculpatory evidence and their witnesses from the FBI and BLM had lied, under oath, both at the Lovelien/Stewart trial and the Bundys’ trial. Judge Navarro was thus forced to dismiss the supersedeas indictment against the Bundys. To this date, Attorney General Sessions has protected his prosecutors and taken no action to even discipline them. Recently, Sessions outrageously authorized them to appeal the Bundy dismissal.

Klayman had this to say:

“The politically motived malicious prosecutions against my clients and resulting cover-up (which also includes Cliven Bundy and his sons) violated every norm of due process and equal justice. I am confident that the defendants will be made to pay dearly by the jury. This punishment will help deter government prosecutorial misconduct, which has now been sanctioned even by our current Attorney General!”

Click to View PDF

Source: Larry Klayman

Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews

4 Comments on Acquitted “Bundy Defendants” Seek Justice and Over $60 Million in Damages

  1. Glad they are suing. BUT the Government or the officials will NOT be paying them the money.. US Taxpayers will have to pay it!

  2. This is what happens when the criminals take-over government, and this was warned about by the so called founding fathers who were against that criminal take-over in 1789.

    When the law of the land is in force by the people, then the people command all jurisdiction civil and criminal, in their county, common law, grand juries. The people have access to investigative powers, which include subpoena power, and if someone, especially a local county government agent, but including a national agent who enters the county to perpetrate crimes upon innocent people – if anyone – willfully causes injury to innocent people in that county, especially doing so with malice aforethought under the color of law, then the people can present the accused (presumed to be innocent) with their trial by jury.

    The presumption of innocence is no longer a presumption when the people, through their trial juries, determine what is or is not guilt, what is or is not law, what is or is not fact, and what is or is not just as remedy, restitution, redemption, fine, or other forms of punishment.

    Since the criminals have taken-over then the people have to pay these criminals (under the color of law) while they persecute innocent members of the people, and then when those victims hold those criminals to account, those criminals make the people pay more, so as to bribe the victims, and avoid lawful prosecution by the people, lawful prosecution where the criminals (under the color of law) are on trial for their crimes against the people under the color of law; in a word: treason.

  3. Jeff Sessions authorizes retrial against the Bundys, but does nothing about Hillary Clinton. He “authorized, or corrupt Rosenstein is still running the show. The department of justice needs to be emptied out, and all new people.

    • All crimes are local. All crimes a centered right where the victim was at the time of the crime perpetrated by the guilty criminal upon the innocent victim. Therefore all crimes depend upon the local people – or peers – to hold the criminal to account for that crime, in that place, at that time. This idea that a (false) “Federal” specialist (attorney, lawyer, con-man, or whatever) commands all the power to wield due process of law in all the common law counties, in all the common law republics (states), that make up the true federation is non-sense, yet the slaves enslaved by this confidence, pyramid, scheme called “legal fiction” believe it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*