Hey Sage Dixon – If It Walks Like a Duck, and Quacks Like a Duck…

If someone were to author an article that promoted Planned Parenthood, claiming that they were Pro-life but liked how PP handled women’s healthcare, they would be called a RINO Baby-killer, at the very least.

You cannot support a Leftist Organization, even in a small way, and not expect to be labeled a Leftist.

There was an article today calling out a Democrat Senate candidate that took money from a group that promotes ‘Defunding the Police’ and ‘Abolishing ICE.’

Wisconsin Dem Takes Far-Left Group’s Money But Claims He Doesn’t Support Their Policies

Does this guy really believe that no one sees through his charade? Everyone knows from the get-go that he is all for the Far-Left Radical policies and he is a far-left Radical!

Insulting the intelligence of the American people is not going to win you any points, or votes. We are not stupid. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then heavens to murgatroyd, It Is a Duck!

And so it goes with Rep. Sage Dixon, of Idaho’s very conservative District 1. Dixon is running for reelection and is facing a strong challenger, Christian Conservative Todd Engel.

Dixon has partnered with the Leftist Think Tank ‘The American Legislative Exchange Council’ (ALEC). This organization calls themselves ‘nonpartisan’ (which really means that they take money from both sides of the aisle) and tries to seem like they promote conservative principles on their website. Until you look deeper and then you see how radical they really are.

ALEC promotes the rewriting the US Constitution.

Dixon has said that he is against an Article V Convention (Con Con). This is one of their CORE Principles. They have geared much of their organization around this Con Job called a Con-Con, with which Dixon cannot simply say he does not agree, and leave it at that.

Sage Dixon Walks like a duck! — State Rep. Sage Dixon, seated center, huddles with other members of the Idaho Legislature’s delegation to planning an Article V Convention at the Arizona Capitol in Phoenix on Sept. 12, 2017. (AP Photo/Bob Christie)

An Article V Convention is just another political term for wanting to destroy the US Constitution and rewrite it according to their needs and wishes. Dixon says he is not in favor of rewriting the Constitution, yet he has attended at least one of their practice conventions. See the photo above, showing Dixon and other legislators attending the 2017 ALEC Article V Convention in Arizona.

Dixon’s explanation for attending was to say that he was there as the ‘voice the opposition.’ That explanation, however, goes to helping ALEC overcome any challenges and obstacles they may run across, therefore he is still advancing their objectives.

While Dixon pretends to not support an Article V Convention, he should explain why he recently hosted a luncheon in Boise to promote… yes, you guessed it, an Article V Convention!

Dixon seems to have learned the art of speaking out of both sides of his mouth. Too many voters now think he should stop trying to convince people of this fairy tale and own this, for it belongs to him.

Stop trying to Rewrite the Constitution and Reread it instead!

ALEC promotes mandatory vaccines

Behind the Push for Mandatory Vaccines

The above article explains in more depth the nefarious doings of the members of ALEC, of which Dixon is a prominent member, as we will explain below. From mandating the ‘New Normal’ for your health, including not seeing your doctor in person and demanding Telehealth visits, to promoting Covid Vaccines.

From their website:

As Americans are hoping to return to life as normal, based on the evidence, COVID-19 vaccines play a major role in preventing cases in general and, at the very least, reducing the severity of them. Vaccines give many Americans confidence to resume activities that had been halted in 2020, as states locked down their communities. How the COVID vaccines are being allocated and administered is important in each state.

ALEC, and their new feathered friend Sage Dixon, are promoting this lack of personalized care because of their partners, Big Pharma and other national healthcare groups. Among the current and past corporate memberships are included:

Dixon has said that he does not support ALECs push for mandatory vaccines, as promoted by them and their BIG PHARMA partners, yet he still takes their money quite willingly. Some of Dixon’s largest donations come from the Pharmaceutical and Medical fields, and several can be counted as members of ALEC. Some of these donors include:

Blue Cross Of Idaho
PhRMA
Idaho Medical PAC
Idaho Healthcare Association PAC
Johnson & Johnson
Bayer U.S.
Melaleuca Inc.

Yet Dixon insists that these companies give to him without any expectation of Quid Pro Quo or an equal exchange. These companies are multi-million, or multi-billion dollar conglomerates because they know how to spend their money. They know where to invest to get back the biggest bang for their buck.

It is another insult to the intelligence of Americans for anyone to try to claim that these companies do not expect something in return for their money. Why haven’t they given to every legislator? Because they know who will help them with the votes they need.

Dixon has also said that he does not care about any conflict of interest from the companies that donate to him. In other words, Dixon believes that it is up to the donor companies to decide if there would be a conflict of interest in giving him money. He will not consider it, as he is fine with everyone giving him money.

This begs the question of whether he would take money from Black Lives Matter, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) or even CHINA? Would that bother him? Does he care if it would bother his constituents? Probably not, as he does not seem to care now.

Dixon has continued to rise in the ranks of ALEC, as he has gone from the Public Chair of their Federalism and International Relations Committee, to the Idaho State Chair and now even further, as he has been appointed to the Board of Directors for ALEC.

This would certainly explain his policy of taking money from anywhere he can. If ALEC will partner with both sides of the aisle, then it stands to reason that their new Golden Boy will do so as well. He can play ‘Nonpartisan’ all he wants, but he wont gather a lot of votes in North Idaho with that attitude.

Nonetheless, this is certainly a coup for Dixon and something worth fighting for. Oh Wait! Have we just stumbled upon the reason that Dixon does not care about the Leftist Radicals and Medical Tyranny conglomerates that run as equal partners to him within ALEC?

Dixon admits to liking a career in politics and also states he would not turn down a leadership role. He has become the establishment hack that he claimed to be fighting against. His friend “Scott” (Speaker Bedke for all the minions) has taught him well and Dixon has proven that he will do whatever it takes to continue his rise in the political sphere.

To recap, Dixon brags about being an Anti-Vaxxer, but he is not about to bite the hand that feeds him and stand up for your rights to not get vaxxed. His cronies are all about mandates and forced vaccinations, and Dixon is all about maintaining the Status Quo for his benefit.

Dixon knows that his constituents are against the Con Job called a Con-Con, and he pretends to be against it as well. But, again, he would have to contradict his new Sugar Daddy, the cronies at ALEC, and Dixon is not about to do that. You might believe that your legislator should be fighting FOR you, but Dixon has learned the ways of the establishment, and he will certainly ignore you in favor of them.

Dixon’s voting record is poor for a Conservative legislator. This is just more proof that he has given up on the average constituent, and votes for his new base: the Old Guard.

If you run with Leftists, then you are a Leftist.

If It Walks Like a Duck, and Quacks Like a Duck, then It Is a Duck!

It is time to vote out Sage Dixon!

6 Comments on Hey Sage Dixon – If It Walks Like a Duck, and Quacks Like a Duck…

Shari February 18, 2022 at 1:22 PM

Dixon’s campaign has attempted to troll this site with hateful rhetoric and vitriol. That will not be allowed.
No~One~Important February 16, 2022 at 8:57 PM

Good article Sharie,

I just have one question. Why would an Article 5 Convention be considered a bad thing? I’m no scholar on this subject but at first glance it seems like a good avenue for the states to override our out of control Congress and to put term limits on those serving as representatives and senators. To place a cap on government spending rather than allowing congress to operate on a continuing resolution, effectively kicking the can down the road year after year. I was under the impression that an Article 5 convention would be a great avenue to stop this out of control government policies and to reinforce constitutional limits, basically the states taking their power back. Could you please explain why you disagree, or if you already have, link the article that I must have missed which would explain your position on this? I would love to hear the other side of the argument about an Article 5 convention. Thank you!!
- Tennessee Budd February 17, 2022 at 6:49 PM
  
  A convention would be a good thing. The only people against it are leftists on the one hand, and on the other, those who see the Constitution as a sacred document, holy for all time, that must be preserved as it is. Never mind that modern times have shown it to be a bit limited, as the Founding Fathers didn’t foresee the level of corruption now extant.
  Don’t pay any attention to me, though. I believe the Confederacy was prescient.
- Shari February 18, 2022 at 1:51 PM
  
  This idea is sound enough for a reasonable discussion. However, the proponents of the Con-Con are already resorting to lies and half-truths to accomplish their goals. This is just another reason to stop the process. If it takes lies to get it through, then it is a bad idea.
  
  I share the following article with you:
  https://redoubtnews.com/2022/01/aggressive-new-scheme-exposes-article-v-convention-lobby/
  
  Additionally, though it is claimed that only one issue can be brought up, it is already being discussed as to how to bring up various issues, since they are wanting to use old applications for varying topics, not just a BBA. This then opens the door to getting rid of our electoral college, and so much more.
  
  And yes, I do see the Constitution as being carved in stone, as opposed to a “living, breathing document” that should be updated whenever the whims of the opposition decides.
  
  Keep in mind, If they cannot follow the Constitution as it is now, what makes anyone think they will follow a changed constitution?
  - No~One~Important February 18, 2022 at 9:11 PM
    
    Thanks for posting this Shari!! I will read the article you linked. And as far as I’m concerned, Sage Dixon can take a long walk off a short pier. He needs to be voted out ASAP!! Hopefully his constituents agree and are tired of being ignored.
Nancy February 16, 2022 at 11:55 AM

I’m looking forward to voting for Todd Engel. First, I’ll be telling friends and relatives why I’m doing that. I trust him to be acting in the best interest of Conservatives in Idaho. He is who he says he is, unlike some others…