Help strengthen alternative media by visiting our supporters

Sheepdog Supplies

Say No To The WHO

This means intrusive and detailed surveillance of everything and calls for increased regulatory actions


Say No To The WHO

By Karen Schumacher

The World Health Organization (WHO) will be voting on the Pandemic “Agreement” (which was cleverly renamed as an agreement to avoid required Senate advise and consent if named a Treaty), and revision of the International Health Regulations (IHR) beginning May 27.  For ease of reading, this is a shortened version of the agreement.  Heck, some of the draconian measures were suggested by the United States. 

Many experts are warning about the danger of both documents, especially to U.S. sovereignty.  There is also suspicion that the revised IHR are only for the purpose of benefiting corporate profits.

While the sham continues that the agreement, rather treaty, is something to which the United States must agree, page 25 Article 5 (1) states, “The Parties commit to promote a One Health approach for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response that is coherent, comprehensive, integrated, coordinated and collaborative among relevant actors and sectors” including  “…collaboration with WHO, WOAH, FAO, and UNEP, presently known as the quadripartite.”  

These two provisions, the WHO “One Health” approach, and quadripartite (the U.S. having only met with three of the organizations) have already been adopted and implemented through the U.S. Global Health Security Strategy (pgs 21, 28, 59).  So, the claims that the treaty is watered down, or that it won’t remove U.S. sovereignty doesn’t matter as One Health has already been integrated into government policy including the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, USGS, EPA, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, and probably many others like the CDC.

This short video explains One Health.  Perhaps the World Economic Forum (WEF) has the easiest explanation, “any surveillance of new disease outbreaks must include humans, animals and planetary changes.”  That means intrusive and detailed surveillance of everything.  As a result, calls for increased regulatory actions are being seen in the food industry with a more bloated government and corporations making a profit by supplying the testing and monitoring equipment When the time comes for any little outbreak there will be corporate profits from the testing, medications, and vaccines, just as happened with Covid, along with controlling the narrative (pg 46 (c)(vi)). But it is expanded government intrusion and control that will be the most devastating.

In fact, the One Health Commission (led by Americans) lays out all the life areas it will impact, and the sponsors of such rubbish include the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and a host of pharmaceutical companies.  As noted by the Commission, Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) will play a “critical role” in One Health.  Medical providers and hospitals screen everyone for SDOH, snooping into life areas that have nothing to do with your health complaint. 

This White House Executive Order is also preparing, without legislation, “to maintain United States competitiveness in the global bioeconomy (Sec 3 (h))”.  This whole infect and treat disease revolving door is its own little economic machine.

More states are asserting state rights by opposing this pandemic treaty.  Utah and Florida have passed legislation that would effectively prohibit any directives from WHO in their states, and Louisiana and Oklahoma have legislation waiting to be signed.  It would behoove Idaho to do the same.  Meanwhile, Idaho already endorsed the One Health approach through its One Health Consortium, and the University of Idaho.

Representative Tina Lambert and Senator Tammy Nichols put forth HJM 7 this last legislative session, which addressed concerns regarding UN and WEF influence over Idaho, and called for a review of international agreements.  It looks like it never made it out of committee.  This needs to be brought back as legislation next year with the WHO included.

Forty nine Congressional Senators, including Senators Crapo and Risch, signed a letter to the White House this month asking for withdrawal of support for these amendments, and if not, submit any pandemic related agreement to the Senate for advise and consent.  Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador, along with 21 other Attorneys General, signed a letter opposing the treaty and IHR as well.

The government will continue to be out of control with these pandemic scams.  Contact these Senators and give them support.  But also, contact your state representatives and strongly request them to initiate legislation that will prohibit any WHO, UN, and WEF directed activity in Idaho, providing the legislation from other states to them as a template.  And in the end, if draconian WHO measures are forced through the federal government, refuse to comply. 

Listen to the enemy, they are telling everyone what they are doing. 

When will Americans come to face the reality that there is no longer a Republic?


Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.