Help strengthen alternative media by visiting our supporters

Sheepdog Supplies

The Top-Down Federal Control Of Public Lands

Idaho land management accrues to the benefit of Idahoans

County Officials Deny Access To Public Land

The Top-Down Federal Control Of Public Lands

The top-down federal control of federal public lands in Idaho has not generally worked well for healthy forest, wildlife, watershed management and recreational access. The federal government owns 32.6 million of Idaho’s 52.9 million acres. East of the Mississippi, the federal government owns less than 5% of the land of the states, but in Idaho it is 62%.

A problem for federal land managers is that many of their intended management actions get tied up in extensive litigation by national environmental groups, paralyzing management of federal land.

For every $1 the federal government invests in public land, they lose at least 22 cents. For every $1 Idaho invests in public land, we gain $2.80. Idaho land management accrues to the benefit of Idahoans for public education, wildlife habitat, economic diversity, recreation and wildfire mitigation.

A great benefit of state management of public lands, whether for conservation, wildlife, wildfire control or timber harvesting, is control closer to home from a responsive state government that is subject to the voters rather than management by a huge federal bureaucracy 3,000 miles away in Washington, D.C.

Republican Scott Herndon supports public land managed by Idaho for Idahoans, not a distant, inefficient, harmful federal bureaucracy.

Arlene Herndon
Sagle, Idaho

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. Consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here

1 Comment on The Top-Down Federal Control Of Public Lands

  1. “Text, as informed by history and tradition” – a phrase from the recent NYSRPA vs Bruen ruling…While Bruen is proving itself a pro-2A steamroller, I do wonder if the phrase can be used winningly to restore another text, namely, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787…Among other things the Ordinance set the procedure for a US territory to become a state and to join the Union, and specified that new states would enjoy “Equal footing in all respects with the original 13″…My question here is – what the hell kind of equal footing does Idaho have when it controls less than half the land within its borders ?…I think a very solid case can be made for reclaiming “Federal” land in Idaho, based on this equal footing doctrine…

Comments are closed.