Muslim’s Sexual Assault of 3yo on Quantico Raises Questions About Criminal Negligence by U.S. Generals
A story broke today that Mohammed Tariq, the 24 year old Afghan who served with U.S. troops overseas and who sexually assaulted a 3 year old Afghan girl on Marine Corps Base Quantico (Virginia), was convicted. Tariq was convicted despite the fact his defense is that this kind of behavior is accepted in Afghan culture. See the story here.
An argument could be made that Tariq’s defense is a good one, since U.S. military leaders told American troops to leave the pedophiles alone since “it’s their culture.”
Members of the military who deployed to Afghanistan are well aware that it is normal for Afghan men to have sex with young boys or girls, goats, or whatever else they find handy with which to relieve themselves.
This behavior is, however, contrary to U.S. law and human decency, and should never be allowed on U.S. military bases in America or overseas.
What should not get lost in all of this, is that this kind of behavior has been tolerated and defended by U.S. military generals who held commands in Afghanistan for the last 20 years.
Remember the story of the Green Beret soldier, 1st Sergeant Charles Martland, who beat an Afghan military officer to save the young boy he was raping? Martland was discharged from the army in 2015. It took 6 months of legal action to force the U.S. Army to retain Martland. Read more here.
“Imagine this, you’re a 20-year-old kid and you’re serving your nation and on your U.S. base you actually see child rapists and pedophiles and hear the scream of little boys at night and you’re told it’s an Afghan criminal issue,” Duncan said. “They were allowing this to happen because they don’t want to offend the wrong people. There is a shameful lack leadership and morality in the Army.” ~U.S. Congressman Duncan Hunder
Our military leaders allowed Afghans to rape young children overseas on U.S. bases and then feign shock when those same Afghans do the same thing here in America. It is pathetic. It is also criminal negligence, and our general officers should be held accountable.
This behavior is not limited to Afghanistan. In November 2021, another massive muslim child rape gang was exposed as 42 adults were charged in Britain. Read more here.
These stories call to mind the writings of U.S. President John Quincy Adams, who published the following in the The American Annual Register in 1830:
“By adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion (Mohammad) poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain…the essence of his doctrine was violence and lust…While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace on earth and good will towards man.”
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammadism (Islam) lays on its votaries (followers)…which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog…Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influences of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.” ~Sir Winston Churchill
About JG
John Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. Consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here
[print-me/]
One of the most confounding things about government of human’s is the application of laws in relation to sex. That being said, it does not seem like any great leap of reason, restraint or decency to say, “Leave the children alone.”
This would not be occurring had the constitutional framers (like their early 1600 predecessors) established government and society upon the Bible’s immutable/unchanging moral law, including the First Commandment and its respective statutes and judgment as the principle border and immigration law.
In turn, this would require that all immigrants and visitors leave their gods not Yahweh (such as Allah) and all laws not His at the border.
No Muslim, for example, would agree to such a law and would look elsewhere to do their dirty work, including the proselytizing of our posterity to their false god from their Mosques. Their would be no Mosques, Temples, or Synagogues in America from which to do so.
However, thanks to the 1787 cadre of Enlightenment and Masonic theistic rationalists (both of which are polytheistic to the core) replacing the First Commandment with the First Commandment violating First Amendment, what was predominantly a united nation under one God (Yahweh) in the early 1600s was quickly transformed into a divided nation under many gods (including Allah).
For more, see Chapter 11 “Amendment 1: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at Bible versus Constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Books page and scroll down to Chapter 11.
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page “Primer” of “BL vs. USC.”
Do you understand that the Framers of the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution were not operating in a vacuum? They were replacing something; namely the rule of King George III.
One of the calcifying events leading Patrick Henry to revolution was he witnessed a preacher being publically whipped for not taking a license with the Anglican Church.
Not to mention that in 1787 the USA comprised a thin strip of land on the Atlantic seaboard which although having a substantial hardcore Christian population was also filled with Indentured Servants and their descendants and Sailors coming into port after years at sea…heck, they did not even know what was in the interior of the continent…they could not forsee what the USA has become.
Along with that, it was the Muslim’s in Libya circa 1800 and their practice of capturing Christians for ransom that led to the USA’s first troubles with Islam (“From the shores of Tripoli”). What good would restricting Muslims from the USA do in that context? It is not like they were beating down the doors to get to the USA anyway.
Don’t see how you are going to win many friends trashing the Framer’s of the Constitution…especially since it is just a piece of paper…and the State’s could have rejected the Constitution…and after all…it is and was the people in the positions of authority who are to blame for bad policies.