The Lie About Vetting Afghan “Refugees”
When UTT published the article “Vetting the Unvettable” our hope was that it would help reasonable people see that trusting the federal government with vetting is foolish, and, therefore, trusting the government to vet Afghan “refugees” is equally as foolish.
When government agencies or private organizations work to get Afghans out of Afghanistan and bring them to America, the question to be asked is: “How are they being vetted?”
In reality, it is not possible to properly vet them. However, the answer “He/She helped us during the war” does not answer the mail.
While there are Afghans who helped the United States and legitimately want to get out of Afghanistan for a variety of reasons, the assumption that the majority of Afghans wanting to leave Afghanistan are “friendly” to the United States has little basis in reality.
Pew polling reveals 99% of Afghans polled want to live under “allah’s divine law”/SHARIA.
Normative and universally taught Islamic doctrine – sharia – obliges muslims to wage war against non-muslims until sharia is the law of the land on earth, and obliges muslims to lie to non-muslims if it advances the Islamic cause. This needs to be taken into consideration in this discussion.
The sophistication of intelligence networks among the Afghans must also be taken into account.
Why do you think the Afghans set up carts just outside the gates of U.S. bases and sold water and soda?
The answer: For the same reason they did it during their war against the Soviets – to collect intelligence and send it in real time to their jihadi brothers in the field setting up ambushes.
Ask the average infantry grunt in the Army or Marine Corps or any of the special military unit operators or any embedded CI teams how much they trusted their Afghan “friends.”
How many of our Afghan “friends” killed our troops at point blank range while serving with them on a U.S. base.
How many of our Afghan “friends” were caught providing intelligence to our enemies in Al Qaeda or the Taliban.
But let’s put all this aside for a moment and bring it home to America.
Al Qaeda (Alamoudi, Awlaki), Hamas (Farooq Mitha, CAIR), Hizbollah (Nada Prouty) and ISIS (Khalimov) terrorists have been vetted and deemed “okay” by the U.S. federal government over the last 20 years.
How well do you think the feds are doing vetting Afghan “refugees?”
How well do the private “charity” organizations think they are doing vetting Afghan “refugees?”
Oklahoma is slated to receive the 3rd largest amount of Afghan “refugees” in the nation.
Governor Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma recently responded to a constituent concerned about the danger posed to local communities by Afghan “refugees” in Oklahoma with this:
“Thank you for contacting my office regarding Afghanistan refugees. My top priority as governor remains the protection and security of all 4 million Oklahomans.
“On January 15, 2020, a federal judge blocked Executive Order 13888 which would have allowed states and municipalities to opt out of the United States refugee resettlement program. Therefore, at this time, the Federal government and private resettlement agencies have complete control over refugee resettlement.
“However, refugees seeking resettlement in Oklahoma are still required to go through a strict, multi-stage vetting process.
“The process includes, but is not limited to: background checks, biographic security checks, in depth, in person interviews, biographic and identity investigations, biometric checks of fingerprints and photographs, and medical screenings. Finally, refugees must attend cultural orientation classes to prepare them for adjusting to life in the United States. This process is conducted by multiple entities including the United Nations, Resettlement Support Centers, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.”
The governor’s answer reveals his top priority is not, in fact, “the protection and security of all 4 million Oklahomans.”
His trust in the federal government’s vetting process is naive, foolish, and dangerous.
Let’s briefly look at a few ways Afghan “refugees” are being “vetted” according to Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt:
*Background Checks: Most Afghans are not even sure about their own birthday. Good luck effectively running their names and DOB (date of birth) in a U.S. system.
*In Depth/In Person Interviews: With the exception of those people trained by Understanding the Threat, there is almost no understanding of how to interview jihadis inside the federal government, civilian or DoD. Therefore, this is a useless endeavor.
*Biometrics: This may tell us if someone has been picked up by U.S. forces before, was at a scene where bombs/IED’s were built, or something similar, but does not help anyone discern between jihadis and non-jihadis in general.
Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt welcomes Hamas jihadis/terrorists to his State Capital
Governor Stitt, is not only surrendering the responsibility to protect and defend his citizens to a corrupt and incapable federal government vetting process. By supporting the Hamas/CAIR event at his own state capital, he signaled the terrorists he is on their side, surrendered his state to the jihadis – that is the way they read it, and he is directly aiding and abetting jihadi leaders working with Al Qaeda and Hamas against his citizens.
It should be noted, this is the same Kevin Stitt who has partnered with the jihadi nation of Azerbaijan which continues its genocide against Christian Armenians.
What is your governor doing?
Does your organization or church support bringing these “vetted” Afghans to your community? If so, ask the leaders of these organizations exactly how the Afghans being moved into your neighborhood were vetted.
Keep the popcorn handy.
John Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here