Help support alternative media by visiting our Allies

Selkirk Mountain Real Estate

Disregarding People With Concerns Over Vaccine

There have been over 500 deaths and 10,000 serious adverse reactions to the COVID vaccine reported

Disregarding People With Concerns Over Vaccine

Disregarding People With Concerns Over Vaccine

by Anne Wilder

I am responding to the article, “The Clamor and Concern Over the COVID Vaccine” (Feb 17 -23 issue), by Conan Milner.

I have never seen the word “concern” repeated so many times in one article. The legal definition of “concern” is “irrational.” “Concern” has been pre-empted via an Oyster Bay Case in Long Island, NY, (https://www.lilanduseandzoning.com/2020/11/30/federal-court-reviewing-town-of-oyster-bays-rules-of-decorum-for-public-meetings/ ) and again in the 9th Circuit – cases where evidence was disregarded due to use of this word. When people express concerns, they are automatically dismissed.

This suggests to me that despite over 500 deaths and 10,000 serious adverse reactions to the COVID vaccine reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in less than 3 months, Milner believes that people who oppose the vaccine should be disregarded as “irrational.”

Let me state some facts. From Moderna’s website (www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua) Instructions to Physicians:

“FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, which is not an FDA-approved vaccine…[emphasis added]

The significant known and potential risks and benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, and the extent to which such risks and benefits are unknown.”

“CONTRAINDICATION Do not administer the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals with a known history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine (see Full EUA Prescribing Information).”

“WARNINGS Appropriate medical treatment to manage immediate allergic reactions must be immediately available in the event an acute anaphylactic reaction occurs following administration of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.”

In order to mitigate the risks of using this unapproved product under EUA … the following items are required. …1. The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is authorized for use in individuals 18 years of age and older [emphasis added].”

” Each 0.5 mL dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains 100 mcg of nucleosidemodified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the pre-fusion stabilized Spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 virus… polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]), 0.31 mg tromethamine, 1.18 mg tromethamine hydrochloride, 0.043 mg acetic acid, 0.12 mg sodium acetate, and 43.5 mg sucrose.”

From the Pfizer website (https://www.cvdvaccine-us.com/):

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 16 years of age and older. The emergency use of this product is only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of the medical product under Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act unless the declaration is terminated or authorization revoked sooner.

Severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been reported following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine during mass vaccination outside of clinical trials.

Additional adverse reactions, some of which may be serious, may become apparent with more widespread use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine…”

The vaccination provider is responsible for mandatory reporting of the following to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS):

    • …serious adverse events*…

*Serious adverse events are defined as:

    • Death;
    • A life-threatening adverse event;
    • Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
    • A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
    • A congenital anomaly/birth defect;
    • An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement [sic] may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.”

For a vaccine about which Dr. Fauci, the U.S. “go-to” doctor on COVID-19, has stated will not prevent the spread of COVID-19, and will not preclude mask wearing or social distancing, it is a lot of risk to take.

I tried to share this information with my local school district, as I felt employees making the decision whether to be vaccinated with this experimental genetic therapy should have this information, but I was denied the right to speak about it at the school board meeting.

 

 

The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews

2 Comments on Disregarding People With Concerns Over Vaccine

  1. Ya know, the vaccine caution crowd has been loud enough for long enough, that except for children, I’m beginning to think, nah, just let those who want this monstrosity injection all die of their idolatry of bowing before Fauci and his sneering high priests in white lab coats.

  2. and you don’t have to take the vaccine…

    21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 – Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies. Read the last paragraph. The vaccines fall under these categories (at least for the next two years).
    (III)of the alternatives to the product that are available, and of their benefits and risks.
    (ii)Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
    (I)that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
    (II)of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
    (III)of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

Comments are closed.