Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

A Little Rebellion in the Idaho State House

Who did NOT attend this historic meeting, and why?

A Little Rebellion in the Idaho State House
(Facebook - Darr Moon)

A Little Rebellion in the Idaho State House

by Shari Dovale

Members of the Idaho House made history this week when they gathered in Boise and attempted to convene themselves into session to discuss what most citizens feel are unconstitutional and illegal orders given by Governor Brad Little.

They needed 36 members to convene a quorum and gathered not-quite-half that many. Instead of passing a concurrent resolution putting an end to Governor Little’s Covid 19(84) orders, they passed a proclamation, read by Rep. Vito Barbieri.

In response to this little rebellion, Governor Brad Little has put the state on an addition 2 weeks of Stage 4 lockdown. Do you think he was unhappy at these 15 house members?

That is what is generally believed, therefore, they need to do this again. They need to call themselves into session and actually take a vote. They need to get everyone on the record as to who they are supporting!

The brave Representatives that showed up in Boise included: Representatives Judy Boyle, Christi Zito, Ron Mendive, Heather Scott, Tony Wisniewski, Terry Gestrin, Tammy Nichols, Dorothy Moon , Priscilla Giddings, Tim Remington, Chad Christenson, Vito Barbieri, Brent Crane, Mike Kingsley, and Paul Sheppard.

This is a definitive list of which legislators are taking their oaths seriously and representing the people that elected them.

So, who did not attend this historic meeting, and why didn’t they?

Look at the map below. Just counting the House members, and discounting all Democrats, as we already know their reasons for standing against the Constitution, let’s see who did NOT attend.

  1. Sage Dixon
  2. Jim Addis
  3. Paul Amador
  4. Bill Goesling
  5. Caroline Nilsson Troy
  6. Ryan Kerby
  7. Jarom Wagoner
  8. Greg Chaney
  9. Scott Syme
  10. Robert Anderst
  11. Rick D. Youngblood
  12. Gary E. Collins
  13. Mike Moyle
  14. Gayann DeMordaunt
  15. Joe Palmer
  16. James Holtzclaw
  17. Steven C. Harris
  18. Megan Kiska
  19. John Vander Woude
  20. Jason Monks
  21. Megan Blanksma
  22. Lance W. Clow
  23. Linda Wright Hartgen
  24. Laurie Lickley
  25. Clark Kauffman
  26. Scott Bedke
  27. Fred Wood
  28. Randy Armstrong
  29. Kevin Andrus
  30. Gary L. Marshall
  31. Wendy Horman
  32. Neil A. Anderson
  33. Julianne Young
  34. Marc Gibbs
  35. Barbara Ehardt
  36. Doug Ricks
  37. Britt Raybould
  38. Jerald Raymond
  39. Rod Furniss
  40. Bryan Zollinger

Each of these representatives need to be asked why they could not go and represent their districts. If they disagreed with the resolution, they would have had their chance to vote against it. Instead, they ignored the will of the people and showed their true colors as members of the establishment and not in favor of liberty.

 

 

Idahoans for the Recall of Governor Brad Little

The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews

4 Comments on A Little Rebellion in the Idaho State House

  1. Rep. Dixon went to Boise the week prior to collude with establishment. He has played the political game. And as the chair of the Business Committee, he cannot even stand for businesses??? Shameful.

  2. Citizens time to stand up…NOW! I just sent emails to a number of those that didn’t show up advising them that they do not truly represent the people. By not even going to Boise I would not vote for them ever again and that I would actively support their next opponentnt.

  3. Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting
    under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or
    privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

    For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include
    acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their
    lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that
    official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is
    purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her
    official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of
    this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law
    enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public
    health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is
    not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race,
    color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of
    the victim.

    The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life
    term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the
    crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

    TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

Comments are closed.