Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

Social Justice Agendas Too Divisive and Expensive For College Students

Schools must teach the skills necessary for students to thrive in an ever-evolving market at the lowest possible cost

Social Justice Agendas Too Divisive and Expensive For College Students

Social Justice Agendas Too Divisive
and Expensive For College Students

Guest Editorial by Victoria Mayer

I recently organized a campus debate, “The Future of American Higher Education” regarding diversity and inclusion programs at Boise State University. It was a joint effort between College Republicans and Young Democrat clubs. Over 450 people attended. The discussion featured Republican Reps. Barbara Ehardt and Bryan Zollinger, Democrat Rep. Mat Erpelding, and Sen. Cherie Buckner-Webb. By the end of the evening, it was clear that diversity is important to everyone. However, social justice agendas are incompatible with both the cost and purpose of higher education.  

This discussion began when BSU Interim President Martin Schimpf outlined the school’s left-leaning social justice agenda that included initiatives such as racial quotas to guide hiring decisions, and the elevation of DACA students above Idaho residents for scholarship considerations; to name just a few.

In Schimpf’s proposals, he failed to address the root problem of college access: affordability. BSU’s tuition has risen from just $3,520 per year in 2004-05 to $7,694 in 2018-19. If the cost had only accounted for inflation, it would have been just $4,647 in 2018-19. BSU’s tuition has exceeded inflation by 66 percent. 

Between state and federal funding over a 14-year span, BSU’s budget has more than doubled, growing from about $251 million to $548 million, though full-time student enrollment has only grown by 21%. Spending per student has increased by nearly 81%. 

A recent study found that BSU graduates leave school with more than $27,000 in debt. 

So why has BSU continued to raise the cost of tuition of students despite the massive funding increases? Why don’t they seek to reduce student debt?

These programs and initiatives place more cost on students and put education further out of reach for all Idahoans. Coming from a well-intentioned position, BSU leadership wants to continue these programs that run contrary to the purpose of education. Additionally, they want you, the taxpayer, and students, to foot the bill. These programs only serve to further divide students through facilitating to a few select groups instead of all students.

When did institutions of higher learning become havens for political agendas? What happened to the primary goal, academic excellence? Countless students have shared stories with me of their professors pushing some form of left-leaning political bias in the classroom. Out of fear of retaliation on their grades, students who disagree feel they cannot speak up. Professors are alienating and indoctrinating students with political views in courses across all fields of study at BSU.

Students in a Kinesiology class are being assigned papers requiring they state that they are privileged because of their skin color, gender, and sexual orientation; regardless of socio-economic backgrounds. One student was verbally abused and slandered in a lecture hall by a professor for wearing a “MAGA” hat the day after the election.

Students should be able to speak freely in the classroom offering opinions and ideas their professors may not agree with without fear of repercussion. They should be studying and learning about their future careers and be able to practice rational thought and inquiry that challenges others’. Academic excellence is repressed when the perceived expectation is to regurgitate political views of a professor, with the intention of maintaining a favorable grade.

A well-rounded society flourishes with diversity. No one group has a monopoly on ideas or solutions that we need, to improve the human condition for years to come. These programs, no matter how well-intentioned, are divisive and expensive. Schools must teach the skills necessary for students to thrive in an ever-evolving market at the lowest possible cost to ensure that all students can enjoy the blessings of education.

Victoria Mayer is the Boise State College Republicans President

 

 

The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews

1 Comment on Social Justice Agendas Too Divisive and Expensive For College Students

  1. “Schools must teach the skills necessary for students to thrive in an ever-evolving market at the lowest possible cost”. Gee that sounds great, and it is what should be happening.

    But it’s not and may never be. The ‘education’ system, regardless of where you enter it (K-12 or college) is an inbred, festering boil on the skin of humanity. It exists only to feed itself and grow larger and more powerful in every way the it can. Kinda sounds like the government, eh?

    In a way it is. It is heavily regulated by ‘public’ teachers unions and government regulations. It’s use of tenure to protect unfit teachers and professors is legendary. It’s wasting of money is equally legendary…paid ‘sabbaticals’, mega stadiums, classes no one wants or needs, teacher pay and retirement FAR out of line with value received.

    Social Justice is Communism, it’s that simple. Why should an American university not just teach but IMPOSE communism? Answer: it should not. And the Federal, State, and Local Government that allows it to happen should stop doing so.

    All public funds should be withdrawn from ‘schools’ that teach/impose social justice or communism. This means not just cash but tax breaks and property tax exemptions. If a school wants to play then they get to pay.

    In my view, there shouldn’t be any ‘public’ schools anyway. K-12 can be funded using vouchers, and the money follows the student. That way parents/students are able to choose the best value for their money. This would break the stranglehold that the teachers unions have, eliminate common core, and we could get back to having students who know how to read and balance a checkbook. Imagine.

    I see no role whatsoever for a ‘Federal’ dept of Education. Zero, zip, nada. Eliminate it – it’s unconstitutional anyway.

    Solutions are there, it’s the will to get things done that’s absent. Doing the same thing, expecting a different result, is insane.

Comments are closed.