Threats to Salmon & Challis – The Craighead Institute
The Craighead Institute has been in operation since 1964 with a focus on research in designing and managing research projects that support conservation in the Northern Rockies. Another focus is “…to maintain healthy populations of native plants, wildlife and people as part of sustainable, functioning ecosystems.” Where on earth did they get the idea it was their job to maintain healthy populations of people? Craighead is a partner with Banovich Wildscapes Foundation, an organization that, around the world, fosters “…cooperative efforts to conserve the earth’s wildlife and wild places benefiting the wildlife and the people that live there.” As a Yellowstone to Yukon (Y2Y) partner, Craighead has assisted Y2Y with conservation for regional scale projects for habitat connectivity.
The Salmon-Challis area is a particular Craighead focus area and is part of the Y2Y High Divide. While the video on High Divide connectivity has been removed from this Y2Y link, a similar one can be found here. As part of their “collaboration”, Y2Y connects with “…supporting partners, who are already in the region to scope out existing conservation efforts, identify gaps and determine where Y2Y’s large-landscape perspective can move efforts forward.” Those partners include Salmon Valley Stewardship and Lemhi Regional Land Trust through their involvement in the Heart of the Rockies Initiative, and High Divide Collaborative, all of whom are currently involved in the Salmon-Challis National Forest plan revision, and who are “already in the region.”
Using GIS-based tools, Craighead has conducted a “fine-scale analyses at the parcel level” for mitigation and development in Madison Valley, Montana, with plans to bring the same to the High Divide “region” for “…laying the foundation for a development planning strategy which will preserve the qualities of the High Divide so critical to humans and wildlife.” What this means is they have created tools in which to map the area for determining how it should be developed in the future, parcel by parcel.
As outlined in the document below, Craighead has three specific goals for the High Divide, restore connectivity for biodiversity in perpetuity from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem through the Central Idaho Wilderness Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, and ensure connectivity for wolverine and grizzly as focal species surrogates for biodiversity.
Specific objectives to accomplish these goals in the High Divide include: obtaining more information on wildlife habitats, corridors and linkage areas; influencing counties, developers, landowners and state agencies on land use practices; “assisting counties” with land use policies, subdivision regulations, and development codes; improving site specific development proposals for mitigating rural development impacts on habitats and linkages; and reaching out to landowners to “assist” them in adopting wildlife stewardship practices. Through years of research, Craighead has created a vision of conservation planning which includes deciding how land should be developed and used.
Corridors and connectivity are not about wildlife or conservation, it is about control over land use and people as Craighead has so eloquently laid out in this document.
In true technocratic fashion, even more specific objectives are outlined on how to achieve the above objectives. A partial list includes purchasing private lands through land trusts; establishing conservation easements; preclude timber harvests, mineral extraction, and road development; and limiting hunting. As everyone well understands, all of these activities are happening.
They also plan to interfere with local land use plans, telling landowners how to manage their property, and informing “recreationists” how to make their camps clean for wildlife, while “listing all strategies necessary to protect each route (migratory) segment, parcel by parcel.” Workshops for local community planners and decision-makers is another objective to convince them to incorporate their objectives into land use plans. Y2Y accomplished this with an Idaho Transportation Department workshop to influence them for inclusion of wildlife overpasses in projects. Talk about the intent to micromanage people, and violate law, it is just the beginning of what they have planned.
They will also evaluate their success by determining how many acres are purchased out of total needed, easements secured, how many counties adopted guidelines or regulations, and how many homeowners associations have adopted guidelines or regulations. This is all tracked to monitor their success at achieving their goals.
Believing we are too ignorant in managing our own lives, there is also an educational component to their agenda which includes educating the populace on why connectivity is so important. They will also go after our children to indoctrinate them in the classroom on climate change, connectivity and land use, and then monitoring how many schools and what grades use them. If that isn’t bad enough there is also the intent to conduct student and teacher surveys to measure effectiveness of classroom lessons, assessing how much they have been indoctrinated.
Is not all of this violating our Republic? Influencing elected officials which violates a citizen’s right to representation and inserting themselves into classroom instruction, bypassing local school board representation? These organizations have no respect for, or recognition of, our governance as a Republic.
Not only does Craighead have a plan for taking over how land is used with their partners, they also buy their gains, having appropriated funds for land acquisition in the Salmon, Middle Fork, $1,837,000, and Clearwater, Middle Fork, $2,909,800 as part of their wild and scenic designation.
Only their 2013 tax form is listed on the Craighead website with $126,487 listed as assets, and total support in the amount of $1,886,773. Some interesting contributors were the Western Transportation Institute, Sonoran, Patagonia, and Wilburforce. Interestingly, Craighead also has their nose in Canada, having planned a resort and golf course near Banff for wildlife connectivity but was “tabled” because of local opposition. Local opposition can get these agendas stopped. Only $202,103 is listed in assets on the 2017 tax form in spite of $1,119,780 in total support.
As a side note, Sonoran is another institute that believes they know best on how we should live our lives. Federal agencies are partners with Sonoran and the US Fish & Wildlife Services donated somewhere up to $99,999 of your tax dollars to them in 2018.
Idaho needs to take note of the Salmon-Challis area and organizations and individuals working behind the scenes to determine their future, in a multitude of ways. Every city and county in Idaho should be looking for the same individuals, organizations, and agendas in their community. Otherwise, without direct opposition from the community, they will determine the way in which your communities will look.
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our stories to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews