Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

Washington 3% Responds to SPLC

WA AG Bob Ferguson has issued public threats against the Sheriffs who have stood against Initiative 1639.

WA3% Responds to SPLC

Washington 3% Responds to SPLC

by Matt Marshall

It has come to our attention that the Southern Poverty Law Center is now planning to classify the Washington 3% as a ‘White Nationalist Anti-Government Militia’. They are also claiming that all of the Washington Sheriffs that refuse to enforce Initiative 1639, have ties to white nationalism.

Washington 3% is a 501c4 (pending) nonprofit corporation registered with the Washington Secretary of State. We are a community-based organization made up of everyday people who come from all backgrounds and all walks of life.

We work tirelessly to support and build the communities. We feed and clothe the homeless. We are FEMA CERT trained and support all emergency responders. We believe that all humans are born with inalienable rights, and that our Constitution protects us as Americans from the Government taking those basic rights. We do not discriminate against anyone for any reason.

With that said, we have solicited to the Sheriffs across the state and have attended many County meetings in an effort to pass “Second Amendment Sanctuary Ordinances.” Currently we have 6 counties (Cowlitz, Ferry, Franklin, Lincoln, Mason, Stevens) that have passed resolutions against I-1639.

This has drawn attention from the Attorney General Bob Ferguson, and he has issued public threats against the Sheriffs who have stood against the measure, to include threatening to send the State Patrol to arrest Sheriff Bob Songer.

To be clear, Washington 3% is tired of watching other gun groups and so-called conservatives negotiate with inalienable birthrights of the people. The government does not have the authority to grant or restrict our birthrights. The constitution does not grant us these rights, it forbids the government from taking them from us. Yet the government is taking away our rights. And the People have been letting them.

There has been too much fence-sitting. Too much complacency. We are taking action to protect our constitution and we will defend our Constitutional Republic against these domestic enemies.

We are not anti-government. We are very pro-constitutional government, but our government is no longer following their own rules. We have out-of-control federal bureaucracies with weaponized District Attorneys.

The Justice department routinely embarrasses itself with prosecutorial misconduct and blatant lies to setup Patriots who actively fight to preserve our Republic. Look at Malheur Refuge, LaVoy Finicum, Schaeffer Cox, and the entire Bunkerville fiasco with Gloria Navarro.

It is time to make a decision. Either you are Pro-America, love liberty and freedom; or you are Anti-America. If you are Anti-America, you are an enemy of the State. Those of you who do not believe that a civil war is already in progress, need to open your eyes.

We the People no longer trust the government. The average American is disenfranchised due to their lack of political voice. Politicians work for themselves, their pocket books, and the special interest.

As Washington 3%, we have had enough. We will not stop. If you want to know where we stand? Patrick Henry said it best, “Give me LIBERTY, or give me DEATH!” And we do not say that lightly.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

THE TIME IS NOW.
WE ARE EVERYWHERE.

 

Matt Marshall is the State Leader for the Washington 3%

The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our stories to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews

13 Comments on Washington 3% Responds to SPLC

  1. To Southern Poverty Law Center…..Sirs..It has come to the attention of Washington Three Percent that you may classify Wa3% as a “White Nationalist, Anti Govt Militia”..Having been, up until now, primarily concerned with State and local beneficent activities, we consider this National recognition by an organization such as yours to be a signal honor. Despite your rather shopworn and stale characterizations, we have seen a marked spike in interest – and membership – as a result of your free publicity. You at SPLC have put us on the map unasked, and we only wish that, in the future, you not neglect us. Your recognition of Washington 3% – left handed as you may intend it to be – has been a boon to us, not to mention a source of great jollity………..Mr Marshall: Please bear with this “Commiefornian”…I couldn’t resist a wry comment or two..Audaces Fortuna Iuvat !

  2. In Bayard v. Singleton [1 N.C. 42; 1787], the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled on a case where the legislature had enacted a law contrary to the North Carolina Constitution. In overturning that law, that Court stated:
    “But that it was clear that no act they [the state legislature] could pass could by any means repeal or alter the constitution, because if they could do this, they would at the same instant of time destroy their own existence as a legislature and dissolve the government thereby established.”

    • “But that it was clear that no act they [the state legislature] could pass could by any means repeal or alter the constitution, because if they could do this, they would at the same instant of time destroy their own existence as a legislature and dissolve the government thereby established.”

      “But that it was clear that no act they [the state legislature] could pass could by any means repeal or alter the constitution, because if they could do this, they would at the same instant of time destroy their own existence as a legislature and dissolve the government thereby established.”

      At the (false) “federal Convention” the smoking gun of criminality (quoted above) was entered into the official record. Those who were trusted with the power to remain inside the powers freely given to them (in liberty) employed deception, a threat of harm, and demonstrations of harm to the innocent, so as to usurp their voluntary powers given to them for our mutual defense, and to proceed from that usurpation to create a profitable monopoly out of a genuine government for our mutual defense.

      That actual law of the land, meaning the grass-roots, organic, natural law, moral, law of the land, based upon scripture, does not allow an involuntary association created criminally; meaning the creation of slaves and masters of slaves by fraud, by extortion, by torture, or by any aggressive violence initiated by guilty criminals upon innocent victims under the color of law.

      The actual law is very simple, and very clear.

      “It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man’s life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue.”

      We govern ourselves, we are not governed by an elite, special interest, slave trading, war-mongering, central banking fraud “elite.”

      If “we” are claiming to be governed by criminals, then “we” are fools. We are victims of criminals, not citizens being governed by our “elected” representatives.

      • “Mr. E. Gerry. Does not rise to speak to the merits of the question before the Committee but to the mode.
        A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house. The commission from Massachusets empowers the deputies to proceed agreeably to the recommendation of Congress. This the foundation of the convention. If we have a right to pass this resolution we have a right to annihilate the confederation.”

        That is the quote that is the smoking gun of criminality during the usurpation in 1789, much like the explanation offered in the following words:

        “But that it was clear that no act they [the state legislature] could pass could by any means repeal or alter the constitution, because if they could do this, they would at the same instant of time destroy their own existence as a legislature and dissolve the government thereby established.”

        See, please, Quo Warranto

    • Excellent ruling and justification of same !

      Also never forget jury nullification as a very powerful final tool. The only thing it nullifies is bogus laws and ramifications enacted wrongly ! Therefore we are NOT bound legally to follow them by virtue if their inherent bogus nature.

  3. Three Percent of Washington and Matt Marshall are part of the SPLC. The fake militia standoff in Oregon involved FBI informants, and actors. The SPLC needs these kind of events to justify their existence. Washington 3% and SPLC are two sides of the same coin. III% was never supposed to be an organization. Matt Marshal has coopted the movement and is leading us off a cliff.

    • Nothing fake about the Bundy crew and Finicums death. Yes there were informants infiltrated but that does not make all of it fake, just complicated with various forms of manipulation and interventions to undermine and negate all of it.

      I agree it was not well thought out, but no fakery at all. All the while Black Lives Matter was burning down numerous cities at the exact same time, attacking people and a few were even murdered, yet they were guests at the WH numerous times ?

  4. The SPLC is a racist (anti-white, anti-christian), terrorist organization. This is well known among those who pay attention. Just because they name themselves something they think will impress the ignorant, doesn’t change what they actually are.

  5. I appreciate the comments. It is interesting to see some of the responses against WA3%. Especially those who dont know us or me at all. The cliff scenario is especially hilarious.

    Bundy’s, Lavoy…. all very real. Standoffs all very real. FBI informants also real. That’s the federal objective… trap Constitution loving Americans… with plants by the feds.

    Bunkerville, Malher, Schaeffer…

    It amazes me how divisive the Constitutionalist can be… we need to stick together.

  6. The cliff scenario is a bit extreme, but at the least you are trying to control the (real) opposition.

    I knew shortly into the Malheur refuge standoff that it was a honey pot operation with the same felons from the Bundy standoff. I remember Jon Ritzheimer making the rallying cry from the cab of his truck to all three percenters to go to Oregon. We now know that he is actor Mike Vogel from Under the Dome. Lavoy? Ed Harris. You were pictured with Ed’s wife Amy Madigan.

    Why would they need to use actors? If one or multiple parts has to be faked, then the whole thing is probably fake.

  7. Matt..Yes, it’s amusing to hear from those who weren’t there, don’t know us, but know all about it. Somehow they have discovered the “REAL DOPE” from the safety of their basement keyboard. In an ironic twist, We – Ammon,Ryan,Shawna,Kenny, David,Jeff and myself were made official 3pers by the US Attorney in Portland. Our Not Guilty verdicts,as against the Attorney’s claimed 97% conviction rate has put us in that select category. The FBI plants ! What a joke ! My own attorney, the superb Lisa Maxfield, hunted down that “John Killman”..his testimony was devastating to the Govt. Another FBI plant – Momma Bear – also testified, but for the defense ! The only thing that POs me is realizing the FBI “Assets” – A-Holes would be a better term – were eating my food. I was a cook at Malhure. I do hope you took my “Dear SPLC” letter as I meant it – a satire on their useless fulminations. No Matt, let the carpers carp, let them have their sour grapes. We remain steadfast and determined, and we’re not done yet ! Audaces Fortuna Iuvat !

Comments are closed.