Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

Finicum Assassination Analysis – The Five Minutes of Shooting

Five Minutes of Shooting

Finicum Assassination Analysis
The Five Minutes of Shooting

 

This video is the seventh video in a series of videos created by Curt Kruse.

by Elias Alias

We are deeply grateful to Curt Kruse for first offering the following video for publication.  This makes the next deep analysis video of various factors in the wrongful death of LaVoy Finicum, who was murdered by the Oregon State Police with assistance by the FBI in Oregon in January 2016.

 

 

Spend some time browsing around the Finicum family’s website. Buy LaVoy’s novel. Make a donation. Spread the word. Share this link. Help this American cowboy family defend their ranch against a vicious government encroachment. Click this link and you’re there. Thank you!

https://www.onecowboystandforfreedom.com/

While you’re there, consider purchasing the DVD which The Mental Militia created for the Finicum family’s fundraising efforts.  That video is a YouTube collage of various videos and includes the first four “forensic” videos by Curt Kruse. That page at their site is HERE.

  To see all of the videos in this series, please go here:

The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our stories to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: cash.me/$RedoubtNews

7 Comments on Finicum Assassination Analysis – The Five Minutes of Shooting

  1. The criminal attempt to murder the passengers is as bad as the murder of LaVoy Finicum – American Hero. They already knew there were passengers and that two of them were female and one was an 18 year old girl. They knew it before hand and still went ahead with the shots at the vehicle before and after it stopped. DO. YOU. GRASP. THIS? They shot a lethal round through the roof that narrowly missed Victoria!! Do you grasp how horrific this is?

  2. Let’s call it what it was, still is, TREASON and TERRORISM against the American people.

    Treason – Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States provides: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
    The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

    Three elements are necessary for an offense to constitute treason:
    — an obligation of allegiance to the legal order,
    — intent to go against the legal order, and then
    — action to violate that obligation.

    28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    This is why the American people are not acting against those domestic terrorists and traitors who serve within our governments.

    Bertrand Russell,1953: “… Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible…” (“The Impact of Science on Society”, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1953)

    • This behavior is unconscionable especially by people sworn to uphold the law and the Constitution. Yes, it is terrorism and treason against the American people so the question remains, How do we get JUSTICE for Lavoy and his family and to do all we can to prevent this from happening to us and others seeking a redress of grievances? How about solutions?

      • If the past is a source of solutions to similar problems then an obvious solution is to return to rule of law, not counterfeit (fake) rule of law.

        The People’s Panel
        The Grand Jury in the United States, 1634 – 1941
        Richard D. Younger
        Page 3
        “They proved their effectiveness during the Colonial and Revolutionary periods in helping the colonists resist imperial interference. They provided a similar source of strength against outside pressure in the territories of the western United States, in the subject South following the Civil War, and in Mormon Utah. They frequently proved the only effective weapon against organized crime, malfeasance in office, and corruption in high places.

        Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury
        “Trial by the country, and no taxation without consent, were the two pillars of English liberty, (when England had any liberty,) and the first principles of the Common Law. They mutually sustain each other; and neither can stand without the other. Without both, no people have any guaranty for their freedom; with both, no people can be otherwise than free.”

        • Was that not a reasonable answer?

          The work done by many volunteers investigating such crimes under the color of law as the kidnapping of the Bundy family members (and many volunteers helping the Bundy family) constitute the same work that ought to be done by a Grand Jury. The difference is that independent individuals are routinely ignored as “Conspiracy Theorists,” while an independent Grand Jury would be lawful if such lawful processes were not prevented by criminals posing as the government. Preventing an independent Grand Jury from this vital, lawful, duty is a serious crime added to the kidnappings, and the murders of people like Martin Luther King Jr., or more recently the murder of Lavoy Finicum.

          The threshold has passed as to probable cause to try the case of the deprivation of rights perpetrated under the color of law, as proven by the criminal impersonating a Judge when that Judge confessed the crimes perpetrated by the criminal impersonating a Prosecutor. That was the Navarro and Myhre criminal cases perpetrated under the color of law, caught red-handed, complete with a confession, all occurring well past that threshold of probable cause. It is the duty of independent Grand Juries to judge the threshold of probable cause to try the case, and if their judgment is determined by them, independently, then a trial by the country must commence according to actual, not fake, law.

          “It is the duty of the Grand Jury to enquire into the nature and probable grounds of the charge; but it is the exclusive province of the Petty Jury, to hear and determine, with the assistance, and under the direction of the court, upon points of law, whether the Defendant is, or is not guilty, on the whole evidence, for, as well as against, him.”

          U.S. Supreme Court
          RESPUBLICA v. SHAFFER, 1 U.S. 236 (1788)
          1 U.S. 236 (Dall.)
          Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
          February Sessions, 1788

          Is the obvious answer not good enough?

          18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation of rights under color of law
          “Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”
          (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

          Independent volunteers have to reestablish rule of law, and that was the lesson offered in the Revolutionary period from 1775 to 1789. So the answer is ignored because the answer is the work that must be done by individuals who ask these questions. The answer is not to ask the “government” to turn themselves in, and volunteer to be put to death for their capital crimes, according to the authority that they claim affords them absolute power. The work that ought to be done is work spelled out well enough above, and this work will not be done by a legal fiction called U.S.A. Inc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*