Public Comment Period on URANIUM
by Shari Dovale
“APCO was expected to give assistance free of charge to the Clinton Global Initiative as part of their effort to create a favorable environment to ensure the Obama administration made affirmative decisions on everything from Uranium One to the U.S.-Russia Civilian Nuclear Cooperation agreement,” ~ informant Douglas Campbell
Uranium One is the Canada-based company with mines in the U.S. that was bought by a company backed by the Russian state. They spent millions of dollars in their attempt to influence Hillary Clinton while she led the US State Department.
This is a story that the Alternative media has been talking about for years. When the Main Stream Media finally picked up on it, the Federal government decided that it was time to look into it.
The Obama administration’s approval of a deal that gave Russia a financial interest in U.S. uranium production is now under investigation. Last year, AG Sessions directed federal prosecutors to look into the sale of Uranium One to a Russian company – a transaction that President Trump has called the “real Russia story.”
That investigation has largely been thrown by the wayside. However, we are now told that a new investigation has been ordered.
Reported by NBC News:
On the orders of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Justice Department prosecutors have begun asking FBI agents to explain the evidence they found in a now dormant criminal investigation into a controversial uranium deal that critics have linked to Bill and Hillary Clinton, multiple law enforcement officials told NBC News.
The interviews with FBI agents are part of the Justice Department’s effort to fulfill a promise an assistant attorney general made to Congress last month to examine whether a special counsel was warranted to look into what has become known as the Uranium One deal, a senior Justice Department official said.
Additionally, we now see that the Federal government is asking for public comments on this issue, please go here: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=BIS-2018-0011
They are asking for feedback on whether we should minimize imported uranium and use our own resources.
The Secretary of Commerce has initiated an investigation to determine the effects on the national security of imports of uranium. This investigation has been initiated under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended.
Interested parties are invited to submit written comments, data, analyses, or other information pertinent to the investigation to the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security. This notice identifies issues on which the Department is especially interested in obtaining the public’s views.
As many are aware, the Malheur Wildlife Protest was spurred by the Hammond Ranchers case, which was spurred by the Uranium One deal.
The public comment period will end on September 10, 2018.
Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews
“It was found to be a conspiracy theory with no evidence of fact.”
Who found what to be a conspiracy theory?
If anyone claiming to be an authority of government obstructs an effort by the people, through their grand juries, to bring someone in government, such as Hilary or Bill Clinton, to answer for their alleged crimes, then the claim of authority is false, and the one obstructing due process is a criminal in fact.
The problem is that almost all government since 1789 in America obstructs when it is a government agent perpetrating crimes. That proceeded that way by design.
The proof of this is proven in each case where a subject of government is processed one way, and a member of the government is processed in an entirely different way: a double standard.
Example:
1. Lavoy Finicum is found guilty by the government and sentenced to death by the government.
2. The one who obeyed the order to kill Lavoy Finicum is found innocent by those who ordered the execution.
It was found to be a conspiracy theory with no evidence of fact. Otherwise political fake news. Just like all the dozens of investigations have turned out to be.
The process by which corrupt politicians are held to account is a process known as rule of law, and it is the process that was demonstrated in the Revolutionary War. People, not the government, either hold the government to account, as documented in a Declaration of Independence, or people will suffer until suffering is no longer possible.
A Declaration of Independence follows the process of rule of law, whereby the people enumerate the actions perpetrated by those who corrupt government, and an offer is made by the people to afford the accused, corrupt, government a remedy. When the answer to that offer is open violence initiated by the corrupt in government, then how can it be any clearer that the government no longer follows rule of law?
June 8, 1776:
“That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
“That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
“That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:”
The people command all legal jurisdiction civil and criminal through their common law Grand Jury process and their common law Trial Jury process. The government exists to aid the people through that process. If the government obstructs that process instead of aiding the people through that process, then the government is guilty of something known as Mixed War.
The People’s Panel
The Grand Jury in the United States, 1634 – 1941
Richard D. Younger
Page 3
“They proved their effectiveness during the Colonial and Revolutionary periods in helping the colonists resist imperial interference. They provided a similar source of strength against outside pressure in the territories of the western United States, in the subject South following the Civil War, and in Mormon Utah. They frequently proved the only effective weapon against organized crime, malfeasance in office, and corruption in high places.
“But appreciation of the value of grand juries was always greater in times of crisis, and, during periods when threats to individual liberty were less obvious, legal reformers, efficiency experts, and a few who feared government by the people worked diligently to overthrow the institution. Proponents of the system, relying heavily on the democratic nature of the people’s panel, on its role as a focal point for the expression of the public needs and the opportunity provided the individual citizen for direct participation in the enforcement of law, fought a losing battle. Opponents of the system leveled charges of inefficiency and tyranny against the panels of citizen investigators and pictured them as outmoded and expensive relics of the past. Charges of “star chamber” and “secret inquisition” helped discredit the institution in the eyes of the American people, and the crusade to abolish the grand jury, under the guise of bringing economy and efficiency to local government, succeeded in many states. ”
A peaceful solution is always an option for peaceful people. Corrupt government, on the other hand, demonstrates routinely just exactly what is a corrupt government, leaving no doubt whatsoever when the people set the record straight through the lawful, peaceful, process.
Martin Luther King Jr. Conspiracy Murder Trial Transcripts:
“THE COURT: Let me ask you, do all of you
agree with this verdict?
“THE JURY: Yes (In unison).
“THE COURT: In answer to the
question did Loyd Jowers participate in a
conspiracy to do harm to Dr. Martin Luther
King, your answer is yes.
“Do you also find that others, including governmental agencies, were parties to this conspiracy as alleged by the defendant? Your answer to that one is also yes.”
http://www.thekingcenter.org/sites/default/files/KING%20FAMILY%20TRIAL%20TRANSCRIPT.pdf
Page 434 MLK Trial:
“Then when they had the plea-bargaining business, I said to myself, here is this justice system, the most important American perhaps other than the President of the United States has been
killed, and they are going to have a plea-bargaining instead of a full-scale trial so that a court of law can tell us, can give us a full transcript of what that murder is about.”
Reverend Jim Lawson
Which News Media would quote from court transcripts if the government did its job and these accused, alleged, criminals were on trial by the people, for the people?
Using the example of the Martin Luther King Jr. Conspiracy Murder Trial as a benchmark of what is supposed to happen, although that trial was delayed for 30 years until the perpetrators had successfully got away with conspiracy murder, but none-the-less using the trial as an example, what would a trial look like with Bill and Hillary as the accused?
In the murders of John and Bobby Kennedy, which were murders before and after the Martin Luther King Conspiracy Murder fact, the “Media” (monopoly corporate media) successfully covered up those conspiracies. Only the Martin Luther King Jr. case was documented through the lawful process.
People today can call someone a “Conspiracy Theorist” when someone points out conspiracy in the John, or Bobby Kennedy murder cases. People today cannot call someone a “Conspiracy Theorist” in the Martin Luther King Jr. Conspiracy Murder case, as it is on the official public record that the people, through their jury process, has found the government guilty of conspiracy murder in that case: just read the transcripts if in doubt.
So…there are the paths open to Americans in America.
1. Actual rule of law, proceeding according to the common law, whereby the accused is offered a remedy, and the remedy is found through trial by jury, and then the people know, without having to rely upon Corporate Monopoly Media, what actually happened in that case. The result of that trial by jury then stands as a deterrent for any future conspirators.
2. No official, lawful, remedy whatsoever, and a continuous flow of false information that divides the people into factions that are set against one another perpetually.
MLK Trial:
“Q. Let me ask you finally — this has
been a long road — how you regard — what is
your explanation for the fact that there has
been such little national media coverage of
these — of this trial and this evidence and
this event here in this Memphis courtroom,
which is the first trial ever to be able to
produce evidence on this assassination —
what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer
is not sounding but is in fact totally
silent — almost totally silent?
“A. Oh, but — as we know, silence can be
deafening. Disinformation is not only
getting certain things to appear in print,
it’s also getting certain things not to
appear in print. I mean, the first — the
first thing I would say as a way of
explanation is the incredibly powerful effect
of disinformation over a long period of time
that I mentioned before. For 30 years the
official line has been that James Earl Ray
killed Martin Luther King and he did it all
by himself. That’s 30 years, not — nothing
like the short period when the line was that
the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for
30 years it’s James Earl Ray killed Dr. King,
did it all by himself.
“And when that is imprinted in the
minds of the general public for 30 years, if
somebody stood up and confessed and said: I
did it. Ray didn’t do it, I did it. Here’s
a movie. Here’s a video showing me do it. 99
percent of the people wouldn’t believe him
because it just — it just wouldn’t click in
the mind. It would just go right to — it
couldn’t be. It’s just a powerful
psychological effect over 30 years of
disinformation that’s been imprinted on the
brains of the — the public. Something to
the country couldn’t — couldn’t be. ”
Had the government and the media faced common law due process in 1963 for the conspiracy murder of JFK, it is possible that MLK and RFK would not have been murdered.
When murderers run the government with impunity what is expected to happen? Will those criminals sell off everything of value in America? If instead a potential criminal begins to contemplate using government for criminal purposes and that criminal faces the people armed with their lawful process, will that power of the people holding the criminals to account for their crimes, on the official public record, deter those wannabe criminals from using government as their facade that covers up their crimes?
If the people maintain their own public records through their common law due process, what would reporters report on other than the official record of facts documented in official transcripts like the Martin Luther King Jr. Conspiracy Murder Trial?
Would people choose to listen to CBS, NBC, Fox, The Washington Post, or would people prefer to read the transcripts documenting the Bill and Hillary Trial?
We need to get to the bottom of this corruption. Who is guilty of selling America to Russia and China. Where do politicians get their increase of wealth. Who dies for purely personal gain.
Share your thoughts about the real Russia Collision with Hillary and Bill benefitting from selling nuclear material in Oregon which resulted in Kate Brown and the BLM running ranchers off their lands and sanctioning the murder of LaVoy Finicum!? With snipers in the trees in an area of no medical or cell service and giving the local hospital of a potential mass casualty event just to stop a man from reaching the Sheriff of Baker County TO SPEAK?!
Who is the Criminal?
Who is the Victim?
How did Oregonians benefit from this arrangement in any way?
Derschowitz a liberal lawyer who proposed that we need to Oversee the Overseers and who is PROBING the PROBERS at the JUSTICE Department as they seem very politically selective about who and what they choose to Prosecute and offer Immunity to?
Is this True?
Is your Opinion being censored?
Demand the #potus pass a bill ensuring #freespeech in the Digital Arena once and for all.
RIP LAVOY, GONE BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN