The Mathematics of Countering Tyranny

There are somewhere between 370 million and 420 million privately-owned firearms in the United States.

May 26, 2018 Constitution, Editorial/Opinion, Featured 8

The Mathematics of Countering Tyranny

Introductory Proviso: The following essay on possible gun confiscation is a purely conjectural gedankenexperiment about the future that extrapolates from recent history and current trends. Nothing herein is seditious (per 18 U.S. Code § 2384), nor a call to arms, nor a threat to our government or to any individual, agency, or group. First published on SurvivalBlog.com

by James Wesley, Rawles

The Collectivist Dream

The current mass media-driven “debate” on firearms (actually more like paternalistic lecturing or chiding) seems to be leading toward greater restrictions by Congress. The collectivist gun grabbers have the dream of ignoring the Second Amendment and somehow magically removing all detachable magazine semi-auto rifles from civilian hands. But it is just that: a dream. If they think that they can disarm us, then they are thoroughly deluded. I’ll explain why, with some simple mathematics.

The United States has the world’s first or second most heavily-armed populace, per capita. (It’s possibly second only to Yemen.) The number of FBI firearms background checks for transfers by Federally-licensed dealers from November 1998 to April 30, 2018 totaled 287,807,015. That isn’t all new guns. It of course includes many second-hand sales that cycled back through FFL holders. But it is still a staggering number. And it does not include any private party (“not through a dealer”) sales of used guns. That is thankfully legal in most states. Nor does it include guns that are legally made at home. (Typically made with 80% complete receivers.) Those home “builds” are becoming quite popular. Their ownership is mostly opaque to any would-be tyrants who might covet seizing them.

There are somewhere between 370 million and 420 million privately-owned firearms in the United States. Let’s just call it 400 million for a nice round figure. Most of those guns are not registered to particular owners. That is why there are only rough estimates. It makes me feel good to know that Big Brother has no idea where those guns are, and who owns them. When I last checked, the total U.S. population is 327,708,500. So that is about 1.2 guns per person. The adult population is around 249,500,000. And according to Wikipedia, the “Fit for service” Military Age Male population (men, ages 16-49) of the U.S. is just 59,764,677. That equates to 6.6 guns per Military Age Male in the United States.

Of the 400 million American guns, roughly 20% are single-shot or double-barreled, 60% are manually-operated repeaters (e.g., bolt action, lever action, pump action, or revolvers), and 20% are semi-automatic. There are only about 175,000 transferable Federally-registered full autos. That number would have been much larger by now but production was sharply curtailed by a hefty $200 tax (starting in 1934) and then there numbers were effectively frozen in 1986. It is noteworthy that if it were not for the National Firearms Act of 1934, selective fire guns would by now be in what the Heller decision calls “common use“. After all, it costs only a few dollars more to manufacture a selective-fire M16 than a semiautomatic-only AR-15.

With every passing year, the predominance of semi-autos is gaining for both rifles and handguns. (In sheer numbers produced, revolvers are becoming almost passé.) The biggest-selling handgun in the country is the Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm, followed closely by the Glock Model 19 9mm. Gaining rapidly is the highly modular SIG P320, which was recently adopted by the U.S. Army. All three of these are semi-automatic. Standard magazine sizes for autopistols range from 13 to 20 rounds. And the most popular rifles of the decade are AR-15s and their clones. Their standard capacity magazines hold 30 cartridges. (That isn’t “high capacity”.)

The Math On AR Clones

AR-15 and AR-10 variants are truly generic and have been sold under more than 120 brand names. The number of ARs (AR-15s, M4s, AR-10s, and variants) sold from 2000 to 2014 was approximately 5,672,900. Since then, AR-15 clones have become even more popular and ubiquitous with approximately 1.2 million more produced in 2015, 1.6 million in 2016, and 1.5 million in 2017. At least 1.2 million will be produced in 2018. It can be assumed that 99% of the ARs produced since the year 2000 are still functional. There were more than 2.3 million other ARs produced for the civilian market between 1962 and 1999. It is safe to assume that at least 95% of those of that vintage are still functional. So the total number of functional ARs in private hands in the U.S. is somewhere around 11 to 12 million. (As of May, 2018.)

Some Math on Other Semi-Autos

Next we come to the more fuzzy math on the wide variety of other models of semi-auto centerfire rifles in private hands. They include detachable magazine, en bloc clip, and stripper clip-fed designs. Here are some rough estimates. (Some of these estimates are based on my own observations of the ratios of different models I’ve seen offered for sale):

Various semi-auto hunting rifles (Remington 740/7400 series, AK Hunter, Browning BAR, Winchester 100, Valmet Hunter, Saiga Hunter, HK SL7/SL8, HK 630/770, et cetera): 2 million+
Ruger Mini-14 and Mini-30: 1.2 million
M1 Garand: 800,000+ (With many more being imported, soon.)
AK Variants (imported and domestically made, from all makers including Valmet and Galil): 2 to 3 million
M1 Carbine: 1.5 to 2 million
AR-180 and AR-180B: 35,000
M1A and other semi-auto M14 variants: 360,000
SIG 550 series: 80,000+
Thompson Semi-Autos (West Hurley and Kahr Arms): 75,000
HK variants: CETME, HK91/93/94 series, PTR91, etc.: 600,000 to 700,000
FAL variants: FN-FAL, FNC, and L1A1: 425,000
SKS variants: 1 million
Steyr AUG: 110,000
IWI Tavor & X95: 70,000
Various semi-autos assembled from military surplus full auto parts sets (M1919, BAR, Sten, M2 Browning, M3, Etc.): 75,000+
Assorted Other Models (These include: Kel-Tec, Barrett, Leader, FAMAS, Uzi carbines, Wilkinson, Feather, Calico, Hi-Point, SIG AMT, SIG PE57, SIG MCX, SIG MPX, Johnson, BM59, HK USC, TNW, Demro Tac-1, Calico Carbine, ACR, SCAR, Chiappa Carbine, SWD (MAC), Robinson, Hakim, Ljungman, Beretta AR-70, Beretta CX4, CZ Scorpion, Kriss Carbine, FN-49, SVT-40, SVD, PSL, Gewehr 41 & 43, Daewoo, FS 2000, Ruger PCR, Marlin Camp Carbine, et cetera): 2+ million.

The Aggregate GUN Math

Totaling the list above and adding it to the preceding estimate on ARs, there are 20 million semi-auto centerfire rifles that are in civilian hands here in the States. And that number is increasing by nearly 2 million per year. (More than half of which are AR-15 or AR-10 clones.) Again looking at the Military Age Male population (men, ages 16-49) of 59,764,677, that equates to roughly one semi-auto rifle for every three Military Age Males.

If a production and importation ban requiring registration were enacted, there would surely be massive noncompliance. For example, the registration schemes enacted in the past two decades in Australia, Canada, The Philippines, Indonesia, Brazil, and the States of California and New York have been well-documented failures. They have been met with noncompliance rates ranging from 50% to 90%.

Even with an optimistic 50% registration compliance rate, that would mean only 10 million of the nation’s 20 million semi-auto rifles would have a current name and address attached, to allow eventual gun confiscation.

Let us surmise that following several years of a registration scheme there were an outright “turn them all in, Mr. and Mrs. America” ban. I predict that even if $1,000 per gun were offered, no more than 11 million would be turned in, by compliant and history-ignorant Sheeple. (An aside: They’ll probably call this a “Buy Back”, but that will be a lie. They can’t “buy back” something that they’ve never owned.)

But that would still leave at least 9 million in circulation, as contraband.

The SWAT and ATF Manpower Math

So let’s suppose that a full Federal semi-auto rifle ban were enacted with a gun confiscation order issued.

This is where the math gets very interesting: There are only 902,000 sworn police officers in the United States. At most, about 80,000 of them have had SWAT training. There are only 5,113 BATFE employees–and many of those are mere paper shufflers. As of 2017, there were just 2,623 ATF Special Agents. The FBI’s notorious Hostage Rescue Team (HRT or “Hurt Team”) has a cadre strength that is classified but presumably less than 200 agents. Together, they comprise the pool of “Door Kickers” that might be available to execute unconstitutional search warrants.

If they were to start going door-to-door executing warrants for unconstitutional gun confiscation, what would the casualty rates be for the ATF, HRT, and the assorted local SWAT teams? It bears mention that the military would be mostly out of the picture, since they are banned from domestic law enforcement roles, under the Posse Comitatus Act.

The Division Equations

Next, let’s do some addition and then divide:

80,000    SWAT-trained police
+ 2,623     ATF Special Agents
+    200     FBI HRT Members
= 82,863    Potentially Available Door Kickers

… presumably working in teams of 8, attempting to seize 9,000,000 newly-contraband semi-auto rifles.

Before we finish the math, I’ll state some “for the sake of argument” assumptions:

That every SWAT-trained officer in the country is pressed into service.
That there would be no “false positives”–meaning that 100% of the tips leading to raids were accurate. (Unlikely)
That no local police departments would opt out of serving unconstitutional Federal gun warrants. (Unlikely)
That all raids would be successful. (Unlikely)
That each successful raid would net an average of three contraband semi-auto rifles. (Possible)
That every Door Kicker would get an equal share in the work. (Very unlikely)
That every Door Kicker would be alive and well through the entire campaign of terror–with no incapacitating injuries or deaths of SWAT officers, no refusals, no resignations, and no early retirements. (Very unlikely)

A lot of those are not safe assumptions. But for the sake of completing a gedankenexperiment, let’s pen this out on the back of a napkin, as a “best case” for an unconstitutional gun confiscation campaign. Here are the division equations:

9,000,000 ÷ 82,863 = 108 (x 8 officers per team) = 864 raids, per officer

Let that sink in: Every officer would have to survive 864 gun-grabbing raids.

Those of course are fanciful numbers. There will be a lot of false tips, and there will be many owners who keep their guns very well-hidden. Each of those raids would have nearly the same high level of risk but yet many of them would net zero guns. And it is likely that many police departments will wisely decline involvement. Therefore the “best case” figure of 864 raids per officer is quite low. The real number would be much higher.

How long would it be until mounting law enforcement casualties triggered a revolt or “sick-out” among the rank and file Door Kickers? For some historical context: Just four ATF agents were killed and 16 wounded in the Waco raid, and that was considered quite “devastating” and “traumatizing” to the 5,000-member agency.

Here is some sobering ground truth: America’s gun owners are just as well trained–and often better trained–than the police. There are 20.4 million American military veterans, and the majority of veterans own guns.

Resistance Strategy and Tactics

Rather than meeting the police one-at-a-time on their doorsteps, I predict that resisting gun owners will employ guerilla warfare strategy and tactics to foil the plans of the gun grabbers:

1.) They will successfully hide the majority of their banned guns. This is just what many Europeans did, following World War II. There are perhaps a million guns in Europe that were never registered or turned in, after the war. Particularly in Eastern Europe, Scandinavia, Spain, and Greece, there is still massive noncompliance. It has now been 73 years since the end of WWII. So the gun registration noncompliance in Europe is now multi-generational.

2.) They will form small, fully independent “phantom” resistance cells. This is commonly called leaderless resistance. Such cells are very difficult to detect or penetrate. These resistance cells will carefully choose the time and location of their attacks, to their advantage.

3.) They will individually target the legislators who voted for unconstitutional gun ban legislation. This will make it almost suicidal for these legislators to return to their home districts.

4.) They will individually target any outspokenly anti-gun police chiefs.

5.) They will target all BATF agents and FBI HRT agents–first with intimidation, and then with targeted killings.

6.) They will pillage or burn down the facilities where confiscated guns are being stored and destroyed.

7.) They will anonymously phone in false police reports about gun control advocates. (This is commonly called “SWATing.”)

8.) They will use time-delayed explosives, time-delayed incendiaries, time-delayed bursting toxin containers, cell phone-triggered IEDs, computer program worms and viruses, and long-range standoff weapons to minimize the risk of being detected, apprehended, or killed. Likely targets will be Federal buildings, courthouses, SWAT training facilities, police training ranges, and especially the private residences of anyone deemed to be a gun-grabber.

9.) They will use anonymous re-mailers and VPN to encourage others to resist by forming their own leaderless resistance cells.

10.) They will begin a War of Attrition on the Door Kickers, with tactics such as these:

A.) Ambushing SWAT vehicles while in transit, rather than waiting for the SWAT teams to set up raids.

B.) Ambushing individual SWAT team members at unexpected times and places–most likely at their homes.

C.) Sabotaging SWAT vehicles, most likely with time-delayed incendiaries.

D.) Targeting SWAT teams or individual team members while they are at home, in training, or when attending conventions.

E.) Harassing and intimidating individual SWAT team members and their families. The systematic burning of their privately-owned vehicles and their unoccupied homes and vacation cabins will be unmistakable threats.

11.) They will individually target “gun control” advocates, organizers, and group leaders.

12.) They will individually target the judges that issue gun seizure warrants.

13.) They will individually target journalists who have vocally advocated civilian disarmament.

14.) Some owners of M1 Carbines, AR-15s and HKs in the resistance movement will convert them to selective fire. (They will assume: “Well, if it is now a felony to possess a semi-auto, then what is the harm in making it a full auto?”)

15.) They will be willing to wage an ongoing guerilla warfare campaign using both passive and active resistance until the collectivists relent. This would be something like “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland, but on a larger scale, with greater ferocity, and with far more weapons readily available. Unlike the IRA, which had to import arms, all of the the firearms, magazines, and ammunition needed for any American resistance movement are already in situ. It is noteworthy that the agreed “Decommissioning” the Irish Republican Army (IRA) was delayed for more than five years because of their remaining caches of arms, which by then included only around 1,000 battle rifles!)

The Gun Confiscation End Game

I believe that once it was started, the whole affray would be settled within just a few weeks or months. American gun owners clearly have the numbers on their side. Once the shooting starts, the gun-hating politicians will quickly feel isolated, vastly outnumbered, and incredibly vulnerable. And when they realize they’ve lost their Door Kicker shock troops, they will capitulate. After some horrendous casualties in a brief but fierce civil war, the politicians would be forced to:

Declare a cease fire and stand-down for all gun confiscation raiders.
Repeal all Federal gun laws.
Order the destruction of all Federal import, purchase, transfer, and registration records
Issue unconditional pardons for all convicted Federal gun law violators.
Declare a general amnesty for all involved in the resistance, and drop all pending charges.
Disband the BATFE.

Without all six of those, the hostilities would continue.

But There’s More

The foregoing math on the roughly 20 million semi-auto rifles is not the full extent of the problem for the gun grabbers. Additionally, there are at least 50 million centerfire handguns that would be suitable for resistance warfare. (And another 3 million being made or imported each year.) There are also perhaps 40 million scoped centerfire deer rifles in private hands. The vast majority of those have no traceable paper trail. Fully capable of 500+ yard engagement, these rifles could be employed to out-range the tyrants and their minions.

Then there are the estimated 1.5 million unregistered machineguns now in the country. Except for a 30-day amnesty in 1968 that generated only about 65,000 registrations, they have been contraband since 1934. Their number is particularly difficult to accurately estimate, since some semi-autos such as the M1 Carbine, HK91/93/94 series, and AR-15 are fairly easy to convert to selective fire. Similarly, nearly all “open bolt” semi-auto designs are easy to convert to full auto. Large numbers of conversion parts sets have been sold, with little recordkeeping. Some guns can be converted simply by removing sear springs or filing their sears. Just a trickle of unregistered full autos are seized or surrendered each year. This begs the question: If Federal officials have been unable to round up un-papered machineguns after 84 years, then how do they expect to ever confiscate semi-autos, which are 15 times more commonplace?

As evidenced by the 1990s wars in the Balkans, when times get inimical, contraband guns get pulled out of walls and put into use. We can expect to see the same, here.

Now, to get back to the simple mathematics, here are some ratios to ponder:

NRA members (5.2 million) to Door Kickers (82,863) = 63-to-1 ratio
Military veterans (20.4 million) to Door Kickers (82,863) = 249-to-1 ratio
Unregistered machineguns (1.5 million) to Door Kickers (82,863) = 18-to-1 ratio
Privately owned semi-auto rifles (40 million) to Door Kickers (82,863) = 485-to-1 ratio

Unintended Consequences

The mathematics that I’ve cited don’t bode well for the gun-grabbing collectivists. If they ever foolishly attempt to confiscate semi-auto rifles, then it will be “Game On” for Civil War 2. I can foresee that they would run out of willing Door Kickers, very quickly.

I’ll conclude with a word of caution: Leftist American politicians should be careful about what they wish for. Those who hate the 2nd Amendment and scheme to disarm us have no clue about the unintended consequences of their plans. If they proceed, then I can foresee that it will end very badly for them. – JWR

End Notes:

Again, the preceding is a purely conjectural gedankenexperiment about the future that extrapolates from recent history and current trends. None of the foregoing is seditious (per 18 U.S. Code § 2384), nor a call to arms, nor a threat to our government or to any individual, agency, or group.

Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews

8 Comments on The Mathematics of Countering Tyranny

ruffadam May 30, 2018 at 3:52 PM

Two assumptions left out of this argument that bode even worse for the gun grabbers is that: 1. There will be no defectors from the “door kickers” who may well bring their weapons with them along with their inside knowledge. 2. None of the resisters to gun confiscation will stage any raids on weapon caches held by the “door kickers”. Very unlikely that the gun grabbing is going to go well.
John Dunlap May 27, 2018 at 5:29 PM

In addition to the end of Posse Comitatus as mentioned by Boyd White, the author missed a few other things. Somewhere around half of the rank and file military will turn their weapons on the authorities rather than follow orders to fire on their own people. Small black market arms factories will spring up everywhere. The government will, at some point, solicit military aid from foreign powers, or have it forced upon them, probably just resulting in our revolt expanding worldwide.

The so called elites do, indeed, understand that there is no practical way to disarm us. That’s why we’re facing a three pronged attack. First, flood the country with immigrants who have no tradition of liberty and independence, to alter the culture and voting demographic. Second, total information awareness (surveillance). I no longer have to explain this; just look at China’s roll out of their social credit score to understand what’s in store for us. Third, the massive amounts of research into autonomous weapons (robot soldiers). Our guns are much more a logistical threat than a military one. No government has ever been able to field a large enough army for long enough to subdue a population that is determined to resist, without emptying the treasury and collapsing. However, if they can produce “soldiers” on an assembly line, cheaply in any quantity required, that don’t tire, get hungry, or have to be paid, have no conscience, and can’t disobey orders, the entire equation is turned on its head. Governments don’t desire autonomous weapons to fight other conventional forces; those enemies will always have similar weapon systems and effective countermeasures. They’re aimed at us.

“They” do understand the problem, and they haven’t given up their dreams.
- Boyd White May 29, 2018 at 6:20 AM
  
  John Dunlap, you bring up a very important part on the robots…by a couple degrees of separation I have had a look into the robots that are being a built, tested and deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are very advanced; the most obvious demonstration of this are the drones…but the land/water mobile ones are just as advanced…and armed.
  
  Other implementations, during the Randy Weaver mountain top assault in the early 1990’s they sent up a robot armed with a shotgun barrel…and note the media reports on hostage situations and note that robots are sent in. They are real…they are armed…and they will be used more and more in the future due to the reasons you listed above.
  
  One observation on the U.S. Military…which also has a precedence with the Roman Legions… and the premise that the Military will turn on the authorities. The bureaucracy of the Military, the motive to suppress the populace, and the capability to create psychological profiles of the Service Members…there is a liability the Military hierarchy could create units who would turn their guns on the authorities and station them overseas…and station those that fit the profile of being “police” within our borders.
- ruffadam May 30, 2018 at 4:05 PM
  
  Don’t worry about robots they are easy to defeat will minimal losses and very little cost or difficulty. Robots can and should be disabled using paint balls or anything else for that matter to obscure optics. Once they are blinded they are useless. Nets and other entanglements will render them immobile and therefore useless. Frequency jamming will render them inoperative as well and there is even the possibility of taking control of them as Iran did with two American drones. Robots are also dependent on their batteries or fuel to operate which is another weakness that can be exploited. Night vision and thermal can be effectively countered using various techniques. Look on youtube for thermal evasion suits and see what else you find. All and all I would not want to be on the gun grabbers side when this kicks off.
  - Boyd White May 31, 2018 at 6:23 AM
    
    “Robots are also dependent on their batteries or fuel to operate”…that is a good point, Ruffadam.
    
    I have seen some of the homemade thermal suits which also are camouflaged…some quite good…but they are still susceptible to leakage. In the demonstrations those leakages are brilliant enough to attract attention. It is a step in the right direction…but night vision and thermal detection is still very impressive.
    
    Note, in talking with an Afghan vet who although being low on the food chain was privy to intel passed along this nugget…”Plexiglass”. Plexiglass can defeat Thermal imaging. It is expensive and awkward to deal with but apparently Thermal does not do a good job penetrating it…and where the Taliban can use Plexiglass they do.
    
    As far as raiding “weapons caches” that has a precedence with Fort William and Mary:
    “On December 14, 1774, local Patriots from the Portsmouth area, led by John Langdon, stormed the post (overcoming a six-man caretaker detachment) and seized the garrison’s powder, which was distributed through several New Hampshire towns for potential use in the looming struggle against Great Britain. On December 15, 1774, patriots led by John Sullivan again raided the fort, this time seizing numerous cannons.”
    
    Then building on that example, on April 19th, 1775, although the British when they marched on Concord were trying to get back to material stolen from Ft. William and Mary…they were also after ALL arms and munitions at Concord…and an example of “door kickers”. And that did not go so well either.
    
    “Deja Vu, all over again.” – Yogi Berra
Gene Blister, Idho May 27, 2018 at 5:00 PM

I don’t speak legaleese, which like medical speak and sciencia talk are designed to isolate the masses from understanding the “elites;” but don’t these exceptions then make any kind of “protection” under the constitution become at best just so much political bread and circuses and at worst legislative mas***bation?

Doesn’t the bottom line then become Mao’s incredibly insightful truth, “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” What then, is the point?

Just askin’
- John Dunlap May 27, 2018 at 6:00 PM
  
  Short answer on Mao: yes. The point? The founders fully understood from personal experience that no tyrant’s hand has ever been stayed by words on paper, unless those words were protected by the threat of deadly force. That’s what the 2nd Amendment is all about.
Boyd White May 26, 2018 at 10:54 AM

“It bears mention that the military would be mostly out of the picture, since they are banned from domestic law enforcement roles, under the Posse Comitatus Act.”

That statement is true right up to the point it is not. This article is the kind of logistical analysis that is welcome cogitation, however; there is EVERY reason to believe that in the scenario outlined above the EXEMPTIONS in the Posse Comitatus Act would be triggered and the National Guard and active Military would become the door-kickers.

KEY EXCEPTIONS TO THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT
A summary of key exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act follows:
• National Guard forces operating under the state authority of Title 32 (i.e., under state rather than federal service) are exempt from Posse Comitatus Act restrictions.
• Pursuant to the presidential power to quell domestic violence, federal troops are expressly exempt from the prohibitions of Posse Comitatus Act, and this exemption applies equally to active-duty military and federalized National Guard troops. (4)

(4) 10 U.S. Code Sections 331 through 334 provide guidance. Section 332 states: “Whenever the President considers the unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the United States, makes it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state or territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into federal service such of the militia of any state, and use such of the armed forces to suppress the rebellion” (Lujan, 1997).