Help support alternative media by visiting our Allies

Selkirk Mountain Real Estate

Liberal Fear-Mongers Push Anti-Constitution Agenda

The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land. Those that ridicule this idea are the real lawbreakers.

Rep. Dorothy Moon and Eric Parker

Liberal Fear-Mongers Push Anti-Constitution Agenda

Editorial by Shari Dovale

Last week, Bunkerville defendant Eric Parker attended a rally in Boise, Idaho to protest the proposal of an Article V Convention, or Convention of States. The rally was reportedly attended by the Idaho 3%, the ACLU, and Planned Parenthood.

While visiting the capitol, Parker discussed his position about the proposed convention with lawmakers, as constituents are encouraged to do. As he sat and watched the House session, he was introduced by Rep. Dorothy Moon. It is typical of many Representatives to introduce visiting constituents to the House, and the Elected officials acknowledge them in return.

Liberal Fear-Mongers Push Their Anti-Constitution Agenda
Federal Agents, Bunkerville, NV 2014

Parker was one of several Idaho citizens to be caught up in the Bunkerville Standoff trials. After 2 mistrials were declared in his case, over 50 Idaho legislators came to his defense in the form of a letter to the US Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, asking for the Department of Justice to step in and stop what was proving to be a great miscarriage of justice.

Later, Parker and co-defendant Scott Drexler agreed to plead to misdemeanors to avoid a third trial. After having spent nearly 2 years in jail, more time than the misdemeanor charges called for, Parker and Drexler went home to their families.

Judge Gloria Navarro recently declared a mistrial in that case and dismissed the charges from four defendants entirely, based on the Court finding that “the government willfully failed to disclose potentially exculpatory, favorable and material information.”

The Federal prosecutors, lead by Steven Myhre, willfully lied and hid important information, not just from the defense but from the court, as well. This information could have easily led to not guilty verdicts by the jury.

But, the liberal left, that promotes a big overgrown government, is throwing fits over the dismissal. They have doubled down on the talking points the government has been promoting for nearly 4 years.

Heavily armed Federal Snipers over-looking protesters, Bunkerville 2014

In a recent article by a known left-leaning paper, they filled an article with what some would call out-and-out lies, and others would call sadly uninformed.

Beginning with belly-aching that the lawmakers made a fuss over Parker being in the gallery, they seemed to think that this individual should have been singled out, not by being acknowledged, but by being ignored. They continued their rant with falsehoods and attacks.

Trying to claim that Cliven Bundy still owes over a million dollars in grazing fees, it is noticed that this “news” source never produces a single document proving this bill. It was shown during the trials that there were no million dollar fees. The only money in dispute was trespass fees of less than $9,000, with administrative fees of about $280,000. Far less than the continued lies by the progressive talking points

Additionally, the article claimed that 1,000 armed men went to Bunkerville at the request of Cliven Bundy. Even the BLM, while they cried on the stand, couldn’t make that claim. At best, they can say maybe 200 protesters were in the wash that day, with more than double that amount of Federal Agents. But, even counting them together, they wont reach the 1,000 men number the liberal provocateurs have said.

They continue to claim that Cliven lied about being under assault by the federal government, though it was proven in court that heavily armed agents and snipers were watching the Bundy family. Armed Federal  agents were in Bunkerville setting up for a war long before any call was made by the Bundy’s.

Without apology, the liberal media continues to attack anyone that defends the Constitution. Another recent article attempted to vilify Bundy supporters by suggesting they treat the US Constitution as if it were their Bible. They imply that Cliven Bundy is a cult leader. And it goes on, and on…

The biased media pushes gun control by saying anyone exercising their 2nd amendment rights are terrorists, and guns are only there to threaten people.

The liberal progressives want to stop Freedom of Speech, except for them. They want to stop Freedom of the Press, except for the select government propaganda sites. They want to stop freedom of religion, except for their favorites.

And they want to change the US Constitution to be more “Democratic”. They want the Constitution to be fundamentally changed, and the country along with it. Does this ring a bell for anyone?

Cliven Bundy, Paradise MT

The truth is, the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land. Those that ridicule this idea are the real lawbreakers.

Parker, and those like him, only ask that the Federal government respect that document, as they previously promised to do.

The Constitution does not give anyone any rights. Neither does the government. Rights are God-given, bestowed upon you from birth. The Constitution only guarantees that the government will recognize those rights.

Despite this, the Federal government has gotten so big that they have lost their way. They have forgotten that the Founders had put a system in place that intended to keep the government in check.

There are many that believe the government knows better than they do. They wish the government would continue making their decisions for them, and for everyone else. They have forgotten how to take care of themselves or how to provide for their families.

They need someone to tell them what to do, and when to do it. What to eat, and how to cook it. They cannot question things, such as vaccines or laws. They no longer understand religion. They have forgotten how to think for themselves.

They have become lazy, and resent anyone that is not. They have become dependent, and resent anyone that is self-sufficient.

And to justify their indolent attitude, they must force their beliefs on the rest of the Country. They cannot just live, and let live. They must make everyone as miserable as they seem to be.

This is Socialism.

And this is why Eric Parker went to the Capitol in Boise to protest changing the US Constitution.

Idaho 3% with Legislators during Anti-Convention of States Rally in Boise.

Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here:

5 Comments on Liberal Fear-Mongers Push Anti-Constitution Agenda

  1. As long as these liberals refuse to honor the Constitution, they should absolutely be forfeit from being able to argue its change. This is not a democracy but a Constitutional Republic with a rule of law that has been being broken repeatedly and subverted by these Communitarian Fabian Socialist, Communistic Collectivists as they vowed to do long ago, and we have seen it degenerate to this point. The Global Banking Syndicate and its core group have been bold enough at times to admit it publicly. “Give me control of a nations currency, and I care not who writes the laws” – A. Rothschild

    We have been lied to about a great many acts. From the IS Citizenship and the “unquestionable debt” within the never lawfully ratified 14th Amendment – to the Income Tax, and of course FDR and Colonel Mandell House who said everyone in America will have their “Biological property registered”… Google that. These Collectivists have been undermining the Republic from its inception. It’s long past time we put our foot down, and honor those who sacrificed all to give us the opportunity to do so.

    • Communist Control Act of 1954
      Findings of Fact
      “Sec. 2. The Congress hereby finds and declares that the Communist Party of the United States, although purportedly a political party, is in fact an instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the Government of the United States. It constitutes an authoritarian dictatorship within a republic, demanding for itself the rights and privileges accorded to political parties, but denying to all others the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution. Unlike political parties, which evolve their policies and programs through public means, by the reconciliation of a wide variety of individual views, and submit those policies and programs to the electorate at large for approval or disapproval, the policies and programs of the Communist Party are secretly prescribed for it by the foreign leaders of the world Communist movement. Its members have no part in determining its goals, and are not permitted to voice dissent to party objectives. Unlike members of political parties, members of the Communist Party are recruited for indoctrination with respect to its objectives and methods, and are organized, instructed, and disciplined to carry into action slavishly the assignments given them by their hierarchical chieftains. Unlike political parties, the Communist Party acknowledges no constitutional or statutory limitations upon its conduct or upon that of its members. The Communist Party is relatively small numerically, and gives scant indication of capacity ever to attain its ends by lawful political means. The peril inherent in its operation arises not from its numbers, but from its failure to acknowledge any limitation as to the nature of its activities, and its dedication to the proposition that the present constitutional Government of the United States ultimately must be brought to ruin by any available means, including resort to force and violence. Holding that doctrine, its role as the agency of a hostile foreign power renders its existence a clear present and continuing danger to the security of the United States. It is the means whereby individuals are seduced into the service of the world Communist movement, trained to do its bidding, and directed and controlled in the conspiratorial performance of their revolutionary services. Therefore, the Communist Party should be outlawed.”

      That paragraph is pure political poetry. Had that Act been enforced the second half of the 20th century would have turned out quite differently.

      For instance, while we were fighting in Vietnam our Congress was passing garbage like this:

      § 201. Short title
      This title may be cited as the “Economic Stabilization Act of 1970”

      § 202. Presidential authority
      The President is authorized to issue such orders and regulations as he may deem appropriate to stabilize prices, rents, wages, and salaries at levels not less than those prevailing on May 25, 1970. Such orders and regulations may provide for the making of snch adjustments as may be necessary to prevent gross inequities.

      §203. Delegation
      The President may delegate the performance of any function under this title to such officers, departments, and agencies of the United States as he may deem appropriate.

  2. The misconception here, as I have been given to understand by a man who is in favor of an Article V convention of states, is not to change the Constitution but rather to include amendments that congress won’t push which include term limits and voter approved pay and benefit packages for elected representatives of “We the People”. Nothing else. As it stands now, the house of representatives has the power of the purse and “We” have no say as to how much or when they can approve pay raises and they are definitely not going to approve an amendment that limits their terms on the gravy train. A few brave souls in the house have tried to propose bills that would limit terms of office and have been shot down by the hierarchy in that chamber. The convention of states would have to be adequately chaired by responsible individuals that would not allow proposals that would eliminate or drastically change the law of the law that has served US well for over 2 centuries. Has anyone ever bothered to read the 27th Amendment. I don’t remember it ever being on any ballot that I voted for. Does anyone else? Point for an Article V convention is taken.

  3. So….Attorney General Sessions received a powerful appeal from 50 Idaho legislators. What was his response ? zero, zilch, nada. Appeals and cries for intervention have been sent to Trump, asking pardon for those unjustly convicted in Vegas. Trump’s response ? we are still waiting….We conservatives sometimes call liberals Government Worshipers, and yet we run to federal officials, expecting them to fix our problems. How many times must we go through this cycle of high hopes followed by disillusionment before the scales fall from our eyes ? DC is on it’s own orbit, in it’s own fantasy world, and has nothing but disdain for State authority. It is time for at least some states to man up and come of age. Stop running to Big Daddy Fed for favors, start taking responsibility for their own life, liberty and happiness. As long as we cherish the notion of some beneficent federal govt, the misconstruction and abuse will continue.

  4. The problem is, the Constitution has already been changed. When Congress can create laws outside the enumerated powers, when judges legislate from the bench, the Constitution hangs by a thread.
    This is why Convention of the States is calling for an article 5 convention. Making a grassroots effort for states to bring limits back to the federal government. If the constitution is divinely inspired, so is article 5.

Comments are closed.