Help support alternative media by visiting our Allies

Selkirk Mountain Real Estate

Bunkerville Standoff: Motion to Recuse Gloria Navarro

Navarro has denied at least 95% of defense motions, yet granted near 100% for prosecution.

Motion to Recuse Gloria Navarro

Motion to Recuse Gloria Navarro

by Shari Dovale

A motion has been filed in the Bunkerville Standoff case to have Judge Gloria Navarro recused. The motion was filed by Ryan Bundy on Oct. 4th.

The basis for the demand for recusal is the public perception of her bias towards the prosecution and against the defendants.

The 25 page filing with attachments cites dozens of news articles pointing to her obvious bias. Citing articles from Redoubt News, Infowars, Las Vegas Review-Journal, Freedom Outpost, as well as a multitude of additional articles, as well as video reports, the motion proves overwhelming bias on the part of the judge.

Even the New York Times states that the public perceptions of Navarro’s rulings have become the story.

Bundy includes a statement from Roger Roots, lawyer and legal researcher, who has studied over 2200 filings on the docket in this case. He determined that Judge Navarro has denied at least 95% of the substantive defense motions.

Roots also states that the motions by the United States have been granted at near 100%.

“No judge in American history has been the subject of more commentary and news coverage describing her as partial in a case she presides over as has Judge Gloria Navarro in the Bundy case,” said Roots.

The motion goes on to explain that actual impartiality is irrelevant. It doesn’t really matter whether or not the judge is actually biased. The problem is the devastating evidence of the public’s perception of her bias.

In other words, the public has lost confidence in the judicial system because of her blatant disregard of the defendants rights. They are feeling that citizen’s in this country can no longer trust the legal system.

The public has lost the trust of it’s judicial system! And we can thank Judge Gloria Navarro for the astounding number of rulings that she has made to prove these allegations.


Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here:

1 Comment on Bunkerville Standoff: Motion to Recuse Gloria Navarro

  1. Ryan’s motion could not, obviously, be submitted to Navarro herself,so who in the Justice handling it ? A case of Caesar’s wife ? but not really…..I have stated from the courthouse that Navarro is dragging the Federal courts through the mud. This motion by Ryan is justified – in spades. Oddly enough, Navarro could be rescued by Not Guilty verdicts, and she had better hope for them. Exoneration would send us away happy and triumphant,glad to leave the whole mess behind. Guilty verdicts would put her flagrant defalcations under scrutiny in Appellate Court, where the judges would be no less agog at Navarro’s capering than we have been.

2 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Motion to Recuse Gloria Navarro – It Matters How You Stand
  2. Religious Freedom Fight in Bunkerville Standoff – It Matters How You Stand

Comments are closed.