Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

Judge Navarro in Bunkerville case has finger on the scales of justice

Welcome to the Ministry of Truth a la 1984.

Judge Navarro in Bunkerville case has finger on the scales of justice

Judge Navarro in Bunkerville case has finger on the scales of justice

(Las Vegas Review Journal) – August 15, 2017 –

Justice is blind, objective and impartial — unless U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro sits on the bench. With her thumb heavy on the scale of justice, the defendants being retried for their participation in the 2014 armed standoff in Bunkerville have little chance of acquittal.

In their first trial, jurors deadlocked on all counts involving these men. Their defense focused on First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and peaceful assembly, as well as Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms. Before the current trial commenced, Judge Navarro barred the defendants from using these constitutional rights in their defense. Evidently, this defense was compelling.

The prosecutor in this retrial knows the defense strategy and can prosecute accordingly. Usually the prosecution prevails in retrials. Does Judge Navarro doubt the ability of U.S. Attorney Steve Myhre to overcome this defense?

The term “kangaroo court” comes to mind. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the defendant a “process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.” Judge Navarro’s rulings violate this protection. As defendant Eric Parker testifies on his own behalf, he cannot reference his constitutional rights or strong “witnesses in his favor.” Previously, she prohibited Mr. Parker from referencing anything negative to law enforcement and had his testimony stricken from the record when he used the word “sniper” to describe the scene.

Additionally, four witnesses to the standoff offered testimony via Skype, and the judge decreed that the jurors will not hear it. The jurors hear only what Big Brother permits.

Mr. Parker cannot defend himself. He was present at the standoff, armed and consequently guilty of interfering with the government’s roundup of cattle on public land. His motives and intents and rights do not matter. No one was injured. In fact, no shots were fired.

This trial is a sham. There is no impartial justice. Welcome to the Ministry of Truth a la 1984.

 

Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews

1 Comment on Judge Navarro in Bunkerville case has finger on the scales of justice

  1. This trial was not a kangaroo court – it was a 1930s era style Stalinist show trial put on the protect Federal government and its corruption and malfeasance. It was also put on the shield former Senator Harry Reid and his son from any scrutiny over their involvement in transfers of federal lands, from shady deals with Chinese corporations and other treacherous and illegal actions. In a just world, Myhre would be a crooked slip and fall attorney, Judge Navarro would be a lawyer for an out of control Homeowner’s Association and harry Reid would be serving a life without parole in Federal Prison alongside Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, and about 200 other federal bureaucrats and appointees for their treason, conspiracy to defraud the US government and a few hundred other crimes.

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Bunkerville Retrial – Innocence is Irrelevant | Oath Keepers Nebraska

Comments are closed.