Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

Sometimes Evil Is Too Powerful To Stop

The more people we can wake up, the more chance we have of not being a victim

Sometimes Evil Is Too Powerful To Stop

“Sometimes Evil Is So Powerful, That There Is Nothing We Can Do About It”

by Loren Edward Pearce

This is a quote from a tearful south Florida attorney, Elizabeth Lee Beck, who fears for her life as she has uncovered sinister connections between the Clintons and the deaths of various people.

As to her quote, a lot of people would disagree with her and would naively say that, “yes, we can stand up to evil and do something about it”. But, let’s take a closer look at it.

Evil is like cancer. It grows, metastasizes, spreads and, if not treated in time, is impossible to reverse. My mother had breast cancer. But rather than treat it early on, she went into denial and thought that she could handle it herself. By the time she realized that she could not stop its spread, it was too late. At that point, all the doctors could do were to try to make her comfortable and manage her pain, until she passed away.

You see, regardless of who is President of the USA or regardless of congress being full of Ron Pauls or Trey Gowdys (which it is not), there is a point where evil becomes so embedded and so powerful that there is no reversing it.

Oh no!” you say, “Evil is not like cancer, it can be stopped, if enough people wake up and enough people unite against it, then it can be reversed and the American Dream founded on the constitution can be restored. God is in charge and nothing is impossible to God.”

Actually, that is what my mother said about her cancer. God could work a miracle for her. But she died, just as the doctors predicted. Prior to her death, she told us not to blame God for not saving her. The blame was squarely on her shoulders. She had chosen to be in denial. She had plenty of warnings and chose to ignore them. It is the law of the harvest, what you sow, so shall you reap.

Likewise, for the last 240 years, we have been warned, over and over and over again. We were told, “Freedom is not free, but requires eternal vigilance”. We thought that we had paid our dues by fighting wars overseas. We thought that was the definition of vigilant. But, we forgot about the oath of office that declares that we must uphold and defend the constitution from enemies, foreign and “domestic”!

Another expression of our love to our country is defending it against enemies. These enemies are of two sorts, internal and external; or domestic and foreign. The former are the most dangerous, and they have generally been the most successful. I have just observed, that there is a submission due to the executive officers of government, which is our duty; but you must not forget what I have also observed, that it must not be a blind and slavish submission.

Men in power (unless better disposed than is common) are always endeavouring to extend their power. They hate the doctrine, that it is a trust derived from the people, and not a right vested in themselves. For this reason, the tendency of every government is to despotism; and in this the best constituted governments must end, if the people are not vigilant, ready to take alarms, and determined to resist abuses as soon as they begin.

This vigilance, therefore, it is our duty to maintain. Whenever it is withdrawn, and a people cease to reason about their rights and to be awake to encroachments, they are in danger of being enslaved, and their servants will soon become their masters.” Richard Price

We fell into the trap that living the American Dream means having a big EAR: entertainment, amusement and recreation. Or, we thought we needed to work two jobs or we had other excuses that kept us from being politically involved and holding our politicians accountable.

So, while we were fiddling, Rome was burning, in plain sight.

Whether the domestic enemies are the Clintons or any number of other names of powerful families and powerful people, they acquired that power over generations, with skillful patience and meticulous planning. The power that they have amassed to themselves is so vast, as to be incomprehensible.

Many naïve citizens reason that the complexity, coordination and the cooperation that would be required to pull off all these assassinations and then get away with it, is simply too far fetched and therefore, not possible. The natural tendency is to believe that eerie coincidences, are just that, coincidences. It is easier to chalk it up to random happenstance, than to a complex network of plans and conspiracies.

And, most people tend to be honest with no sinister agendas. Hence, for them the concept of a deep state of elitists who spend vast resources of money and energy on evil plots to extend their power, does not fit their paradigm and is not in their world of normalcy.

Bringing it down to simple terms, the elite, who murder their enemies, have unlimited resources to pull it off. Offering $10 million to a world class hitman to take out an enemy, is nothing to them when they have access to billions (trillions?).

The Manhattan project, that miraculously converted E=MC2 into a working atom bomb in two years, was made possible by a vast and secret conspiracy of over 100,000 workers who managed to pull it off without any significant leaks.

Likewise, the elite today, also known as the “deep state”, have learned how to destroy their enemies and increase in power and wealth without anybody to stop them and do so with complex strategies and coordination.

Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying to roll over and give up. We have an obligation to keep trying. Security is in numbers. The more people we can wake up, the more chance we have of not being a victim of the assassination or prison machine of the elite, deep state psychopaths.

Regrettably, I agree with the quote from Elizabeth Lee Beck. There is a point when evil is so powerful, that it cannot be stopped. God can deliver us as individuals or small groups, but it is too late to be delivered as a nation. Consequently, “the righteous shall not fear if they are prepared”. Be prepared by being awake and by being righteous.

 

Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews

4 Comments on Sometimes Evil Is Too Powerful To Stop

  1. “But mouse, you are not alone in proving foresight may be in vain. The best laid plans of mice and men go often askew “…Both king and Gandhi would reject your grim diagnosis, and if we put our predicament today into a historic perspective, we’ll see that untruth and gross injustice are defeated in the end. Interesting that you would cite the Manhattan project as an example of an airtight cabal. Despite the most ruthless security, spies were at work from inside, and Uncle Joe just smiled when Truman told him about the Bomb…he knew all about it..Have you forgotten that insider’s insider, Deep Throat ? As fearsome as Goliath may appear,audacity laid him low. This is not to say there will be no costs to us in this fight, but acting with honor and in good faith, more and more of us see the stakes we are playing for, and are willing to pay the price. We will pay forward……




    0



    0
  2. I disagree with the premise. Evil always fails, as even when left unopposed, it is eventually laid low by its own hubris. In the case of our nation, the success of the cabal was due at first mainly to collusion by the Fourth Estate (the press, for those who’ve never heard that term). It is now primarily due to the fact that the people are still conducting themselves under the illusion that the rule of law is in effect, while the political class thinks of themselves as above it. I don’t think this state of affairs will last much longer, as a growing number of people are disabusing themselves of this notion, and coming to understand the true nature of the political class, a lesson the rest of the world never forgot. It really comes down to the question, “what will you risk to give your children freedom?” It is true, the longer evil goes unopposed, the higher the cost of containing it. The tyrant’s greatest fear, is a populace who have divested themselves of any need to survive the act of pulling him down. Have we reached that point? Perhaps. I suspect we’ll have a definite answer very soon.




    0



    0
  3. The one thing that can make the difference here in our nation in sopping and replacing the evil that exists within our governments is “We the People of the united States” doing our constitutional duty. WE are not supposed to have an armed government of “law enforcement”, instead both the state and federal government are required in writing to use the Militia of the several states (trained as the Congress requires the military to be trained, and educated in the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution) to
    — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
    — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
    — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    With that constitutional requirement is the unwritten forbidding of governmental professional law enforcement to be used for those purposes. No other type of law enforcement is allowed except for the Sheriff (elected by the people), no Lawful sheriff can be assigned (capital “L” denotes constitutional Laws).

    US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

    The duties that those that serve within our governments have to the Militias is found in Clause 16.

    Some things to consider is that one who breaks the required Oath of all that serve within our governments commit a felony and the crime of Perjury. Our government is a constitutional republic, and all duties that are assigned are in writing, all “powers” that come with those positions are in writing, it IS the supreme contract for all who serve within our governments – state and federal; with state Constitutions being the highest contract for those who serve within state governments. ALL who serve in any type of governmental position is required to take the Oath to support and defend the US Constitution, and then if is a state employee of any type, to also support and defend that state’s Constitution.

    If one does not know what those who serve within our government is allowed to do, and forbidden to do, and in rare occasions allowed to do only under specific named-in-writing conditions and then only carried out in a specific way (also described in writing); then how can they be held accountable for their actions?

    WE are required by the US Constitution to charge them with the crimes they have committed, then the Militia arrests them – what effort it takes to arrest them is up to the person charged with the crimes as it is with all who are to be arrested, then they are held for a jury trial. Do not think that only judges can call forth the *Grand Jury, or call for a *Grand Jury Investigation. That is a tool constitutionally assigned to the people, not to any branch or office within a branch.

    Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.

    “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)

    “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”

    “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”

    “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”

    “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”

    “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) (end Grand Jury quote)

    It is up to us, “We the people… as to what we do.

    Daniel Webster: “We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land – nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.”

    Daniel Webster: “Is the Constitution worth preserving?” He said, “Then guard it as you would the very seat of your life. Guard it not only against the open blows of violence but also against that spirit of change.”

    James Madison: “Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.”

    Some things to consider; remember Kissinger said that “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” This is why we are at war in foreign nations, NOT TO DEFEND OUR NATION, OUR PEOPLE, OUR CONSTITUTION. Until we get those who serve within our government replaced, no one who is in domestic or foreign enforcement should follow any order other then those that STRICTLY follow the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution.

    Also consider Hitler’s words and what we have today in our nation as domestic enforcement; Hitler: “What luck for rulers that people do not think.”

    The PATRIOT ACT’s crowning jewel is the Department of Homeland Security. What most Americans do not understand is that the DHS was modeled after Heinrich Himmler’s RSHA (Nazi Germany), where they created a system that was incorporating all Nazi police departments under the control of what they called the Department of National Security. The Department of Homeland Security was also known as the Reichssicherheitshauptamt.

    George Washington: “However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

    Brookfield Construction Company V. Stewart 284 F Sup. 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government.”

    Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

    Bertrand Russell,1953: “… Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible…” (“The Impact of Science on Society”, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1953)

    Daniel Webster: “Where is it written in the Constitution, in what article or section is it contained, that you may take children from their parents and parents from their children, and compel them to fight the battles of any war in which the folly and wickedness of the government may engage itself? Under what concealment has this power lain hidden, which now for the first time comes forth, with a tremendous and baleful aspect, to trample down and destroy the dearest right of personal liberty? Who will show me any Constitutional injunction which makes it the duty of the American people to surrender everything valuable in life, and even life, itself, whenever the purposes of an ambitious and mischievous government may require it? … A free government with an uncontrolled power of military conscription is the most ridiculous and abominable contradiction and nonsense that ever entered into the heads of men”.




    0



    0
  4. Well put John…We will fight now while there is hope rather than having to fight later when there is no hope. There is simply no alternative. Evil must not prevail. As you may know, I’m a vet of Bundy ranch, Sugar Pine, Malhure and as one of those acquitted last year with Ammon and Ryan. Along the way we have sparked a tremendous awakening. After Bundy ranch, Harry Reid said “It’s not over yet”. Yes, That’s right Harry, it is definitely not over yet. But….you can’t make history sitting down. You have to stand up….




    0



    0

Comments are closed.