Help support alternative media by visiting our Allies

Selkirk Mountain Real Estate

Prosecutors Seek Sanctions Against Defense Attorneys

Prosecutor Myrhe demanded that Tanasi be punished for asking a forbidden question.

Prosecutors Seek Sanctions Against Steven Stewart’s Attorney
Militia men surrounding the ranch of Cliven Bundy gather at the back of a parked pickup truck in Bunkerville, Nevada May 3, 2014. (Reuters)

Prosecutors Seek Sanctions Against Steven Stewart’s Attorney

by Staff Writer

The U.S. Justice Department is pulling no punches in the “Bunkerville Retrial” of Eric Parker, Steven Stewart, Scott Drexler and Rick Lovelein currently underway in a federal courtroom in Las Vegas, Nevada.

During morning arguments on Tuesday, July 25, 2017, Acting U.S. Attorney Steven Myhre demanded that Judge Gloria Navarro impose sanction and punishment on the defense team, especially Steven Stewart’s court-appointed attorney Richard Tanasi.  Prosecutors argued that Tanasi crossed a line during questioning of a witness the day before.

With the jury outside the courtroom, and the audience barely in their seats, Myrhe accused Tanasi of knowingly violating an ‘order in limine’ which prohibits the defense from mentioning forbidden topics.  The day before, while questioning a witness named Trey Schillie, Tanasi had asked if Schillie feared being shot by Bureau of Land Management (BLM) agents.  The topic of BLM conduct is strictly off limits according to an order imposed by the Judge just before the start of trial.

Trey Schillie, a tourist on vacation (who happened to be employed by the U.S. Forest Service in Colorado) was driving on I-15 northbound on April 12, 2014 when he found himself in the heart of the famed “Bundy standoff” that day.  Schillie parked his car on the roadside and walked over to see what was happening.  He took several now-famous photographs of the protesters in the wash below the bridge, and of the crowd on top of the northbound bridge.  Among his photos was one of Defendant Eric Parker prone on the bridge with a rifle positioned in a crack between the bridge’s concrete barriers.

At the end of his direct testimony and cross-examination, the jurors asked a series of questions of Schillie, and Schillie responded that he felt fear while standing on the bridge taking pictures.  This left an obvious question that badly needed to be resolved: did Schillie feel fear from the protesters surrounding him on the bridge or from the armed BLM agents aiming weapons in his direction down below?  The photos show several people (not just Parker) in crouching positions behind the concrete, indicating a fear on the bridge that federal agents might open fire on them.

Attorney Tanasi was virtually compelled to ask the obvious question of Mr. Schillie.  Tanasi sought to pin down the witness, first asking if Schillie saw anyone on the bridge pointing weapons at him.  Then Tanasi asked Schillie to affirm that the BLM agents at a distance in the Wash below were pointing weapons in his direction.  The prosecution objected immediately, and Schillie never answered.

Trial continued with another witness on the afternoon of the 24th.  But Tanasi’s ‘source-of-fear’ question was the focus of the prosecution the following morning.  Prosecutor Myrhe demanded that Tanasi be punished for asking a forbidden question.  Judge Navarro asked Myrhe what punishment he would recommend, and Myrhe responded that the defense (not just Tanasi but all the defense lawyers) should be made to disclose to the prosecution their closing arguments.  The prosecution also demanded an instruction to the jury that BLM conduct is not an issue in the trial.


Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here:

2 Comments on Prosecutors Seek Sanctions Against Defense Attorneys

  1. Exactly! I certainly am no legal expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I’ve watched this kind of bunk in other court cases as well, where anything that could prove the person innocent is absolutely forbidden from being mentioned, and so much so, that the jury actually has no idea whatsoever what actually even took place in regard to the accused!
    How have our courts managed to descend into nothing more than a fraud? I think this is the era for Legislators to start weeding out these lawless judges and recalling them. Legislatore are the only people who have the authority to recall bad judges. If they would seize the opportunity of this current Presidential administration, I believe we would all have a chance of turning this foul mess in our kangaroo courts around.
    The judges know it too. They know this could very well be their last hoorah because the spirit of true Americans is finally being revived and the drive to get rid of the rampant evil is a blessing upon our nation…finally! God Bless Trump for leading the way!

  2. The conduct of the BLM can not be brought up in the trial even though the conduct of the BLM is the reason the whole incident happened.

    I am not the smartest man in the world, but if I can figure out how bat s*** crazy that is you would think people in the Government responsible for overseeing Federal Court cases would be able to figure it out.

Comments are closed.