Help support alternative media by visiting our advertisers

Liberty Advocates and the Freedom Agenda

Do not question the motives of your fellow Patriot – rejoice in their help and celebrate the victory.

The Agenda of the Liberty Movement

Liberty Advocates and the Freedom Agenda

By Shari Dovale

Our Country is under attack. The US Constitution and our way of life are hanging by a thread. The elite government officials, through all of their organizations, are driven to preserve their own aristocratic way of life. That cannot be accomplished through the system of government that originated in this country, therefore, they must change our founding principles to meet their agenda. This is a war on the people, the citizens of the country, our beliefs and our way of life.

To accomplish this, they misrepresent the Constitution and rewrite the law to benefit themselves. It began with the assertion that we are a Democracy. We are not. The truth is we are a Constitutional Republic, and everyone elected to government office knows this, but they choose to ignore it in their quest for a Totalitarian society. It is not Communism, though many confuse it as such.

Totalitarianism is a political system that does not recognize the rights of the individuals and places no restrictions on the authority of the state.

There is a movement that has been active for years, decades, generations. This is the Liberty movement. It has recently become recognized by more citizens, those that have awakened to the over-reaching of the Federal government.

A case can be made that the Bunkerville standoff in April 2014 was a wake up call for many Americans. Even the Malheur Protest in Burns Oregon, and the subsequent murder of LaVoy Finicum, was a catalyst. However, thousands of citizens were informed and aware long before these events.

Remember the Civil Rights movement of the sixties? The Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Sit-ins, The Freedom Ride?

How about Coxey’s Army? The Sagebrush Rebellion? And the Bonus Army?

Even the Suffrage Movement was based on Liberty.

The principles of Liberty are not something that most of the citizens are instructed in as they grow up. The public school system actively teaches the Socialist ideals, discouraging any opposing viewpoint. The understanding of Liberty is attained after years of watching their way of life be trampled on.

Liberty will not be found within any political party. It will not be found in the halls of the Capitol Building. It will only be found within the hearts of the people that fight for it.

The Patriots are striving for the same principles that our Founding Fathers believed in: Common sense principles. God-given rights that are guaranteed by our Constitution.

Read our agenda here: America’s Founding Documents

This is a fight for Freedom for all Americans. Various people will have their moment in the headlines, as there are many under attack. Constitutional violations by the Federal government are rampant. That is their plan and agenda. To overwhelm the people and ensure their acquiescence.

It is time that we overwhelm them with all of our fellow Patriots insisting on our Founding Principles. We need everyone to contribute.

Everyone has a role. Some, like me, write articles to enlighten, educate, and inform the public. Others make videos for the same reason. Still more will make phone calls to elected officials, write letters to the imprisoned, or organize events.

Do not question the motives of your fellow Patriot – rejoice in their help and celebrate the victory. You do not need to agree with your neighbor 100% on each detail. We all need to understand that everyone has a role in our fight for Liberty. Each will their recognize their own purpose, and every undertaking is vital to our success.

I appreciate everyone in the Liberty Movement. I don’t need to stand on every street corner to show this. They don’t need to write or make phone calls to have an important part in this battle.

The most successful people are those that can work across the aisle. You may not agree with someone all of the time, but there is probably something on which you can both agree. That is a great place to start. Work on that one item. We will all be blessed for your accomplishment.

Who Leads the Liberty Movement?

The Federal Government is desperate to find the “Leaders” of the Liberty movement. Their goal is to ‘cut off the head of the snake’, or prevent the problem from growing and escalating. The same thoughts that were expressed by Oregon Senator Ron Wyden: to keep the virus from spreading.

Here is a newsflash for them: The only leader of the Liberty movement is God himself. There are thousands involved in returning our country to what the founders envisioned. They are all doing God’s work. This is His plan and His agenda.

This is not a movement that has been engineered by any one person, and it cannot be accomplished by any single person. This is a national issue and must be fought on that level, with everyone having a part in it.

This country was founded on Judaeo-Christian principles. It was founded by God. This battle will not be won by the people, but by God himself. This is a founding belief of all Christian Conservatives in the battle for Liberty.

If there is a specific agenda, it is spoken by God himself:

2 Chronicles 20:15

He said: “Listen, King Jehoshaphat and all who live in Judah and Jerusalem! This is what the Lord says to you: ‘Do not be afraid or discouraged because of this vast army. For the battle is not yours, but God’s.

 

 

 

8 Comments on Liberty Advocates and the Freedom Agenda

  1. Excellent Shari, Thank you ! Lets not forget the Indian occupation of Federal property – Alcatraz no less – in 69/70. The criminals now occupy the bench and the Govt. table, while the upright and courageous are persecuted. The “Federal Culture” wishes to enforce the “Government Interest” on us,from the top down , while we defend the AMERICAN INTEREST from the bottom up…..All well and good to comment here, but where does the rubber hit the road ? The place is Vegas , and the time will be the next trial…….

  2. Thank you, Neil. Yes, there are many examples. Keep them coming, I want the world to get a handle on this.

    I am trying to firm up my plans to be in Vegas. I will let everyone know soon!

  3. Sorry, but I cannot ignore this:
    Quoting Rick Warren is not a good thing.
    At the 2009 “inauguration” of BS-Barry, Warren prayed in the name of “Isa”, which islam claims to be Jesus and Warren appears to believe “Isa” and Jesus are one in the same.

    Don’t believe me – go find the inaugural prayer on youtube and listen to him.

  4. Shari, please feel free to delete my previous comment – I just wanted you to know that Warren seems to be part of the lie.

  5. Founding documents? How can you publish that with a straight face? Perhaps it is published with tongue firmly n cheek?

    There is a Declaration of Independence which enumerates the crimes against humanity perpetrated by the worst criminal running the worst criminal organization that was then on the planet earth. OK, got that one.

    There is no mention of the Independent State Constitutions (one state had no constitution: their law was in their collective memory), nor is there any mention of the Articles of Confederation that served and protected well enough to drive off the worst criminal army of aggression for profit that was then on the planet. Why not mention the State Constitutions, the Bills of Rights in State Constitutions, the common law, trial by jury, trial by the country? Too wordy?

    Then the slave trading Constitution is hoisted as a “founding” document? The same “constitution” that claims, in no uncertain terms, that anyone found to be resisting government tyranny will be crushed, and everyone will be made to pay for crushing out anyone failing to obey without question.

    So by this confusing logic what constitutes a “founding” document?

    Is a founding document the same “founding” document that afforded the central bankers all the leverage they needed to enforce their central banking fraud, and the extortion hidden as a tax required to create the demand for the central bank counterfeit money?

    That is a founding document?

    The founding document is also the order, to be obeyed without question, that subsidizes the crime of African Slavery? That is a founding document?

    What is being founded?

    The Bill of Rights that supposedly amended the subsidizing slave trading deal, on the other hand, was categorically opposed to the tyrannical Con Con of 1787, so what is being founded in these opposing documents?

    What is being founded but a despotic sandwich with meat in the middle carved from liberty lovers who dared to be the bread?

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

    What does that say? Anyone care to explain?

    “15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;”

    What does that say, exactly? Care to offer an example of what that means: exactly?

    “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

    Anyone? Does anyone think anymore?

  6. “This is a national issue and must be fought on that level, with everyone having a part in it.”

    Is that true, can that statement be held to an accurate accounting of the facts that matter? Does that statement suggest that it is National Interest that is at stake, and therefore, in that name, that name of National Interest, something must be done to protect the National Interest?

    At the times, and in the places (localities, meaning all law is local), where actual law power was exercised for the people, of the people, and by the people, it was, therefore, demonstrated that the interest at stake was the whole people’s interest, not the National Interest.

    An example is provided in the history of the process known as democracy, which is not the modern, false, claim that democracy is so-called Mob Rule. Democracy was, and is, people volunteering to be the government themselves, not people obeying, without question, whatever someone claiming to speak for the National Interest must be obeyed or else.

    When the interest is the people themselves, as a whole, not a legal fiction such as a Nation with a National Interest, the government is said to be a republic: the public thing is the meaning of the Latin word respublica, from which the English word republic is derived.

    In American history the local populations from all over the country formed local common law counties, common law states, which were said to be Nations, and each Nation was an experiment in democracy, the size of each Nation proved to be instructive concerning which size of which democratic republic, or nation state, was a workable size, not too big, not too small, and some Nation State governments began granting access to land because their nation state was too big for a national government, and for other reasons.

    Rhode Island was not one of the nation states that were too big. Some nation states grew despotic, while other nation states accepted, protected, and provided the benefits of a sanctuary for runaway slaves, who were merely people willing and able to defend their natural born rights to live and let live, just like the veterans of the Revolutionary War.

    Daniel Shays, for example, ran from a despotic turning Massachusetts to Vermont, which proves beyond reasonable doubt, that a federal voluntary association for mutual defense works to maintain experiments in democracy, which is the same thing as saying a free market of government services, to be paid for by voluntary contribution, or not. Daniel Shays was a Revolutionary War veteran.

    Someone profiting off of the government monopoly, or despotism, in Massachusetts could have claimed that it was a Federal issue, for their profitable monopoly was threatened by Revolutionary War veterans who thought that the Revolution has been lost in Massachusetts, and that war profiteer in Massachusetts could have also claimed that it was a federal issue that the runaway slave named Daniel Shays must be returned to slavery in Massachusetts, for the sake of the nation state Massachusetts, and for the sake of the federation of independent nation states. Someone in Massachusetts, in command of the despotic nation state in Massachusetts, would have no cause to claim that the federation was one single Nation-State, and anyone found running away from slavery in one state would be required by the National government, in the national interest, to return the runaway slave to the slavers, or else.

    So…just exactly what is the current threat to liberty threatening everyone in every county in every single state in America, and why do those threats in those localities represent a National Interest? Are the slaves threatening to stop aiding and abetting the slavers who run their slave business from a foreign corporation located in the District of Columbia? Does that district actually exists, or is it too just a legal fiction?

    What might one of the federalists, who was a democrat and a republican, say about legal fictions? Don’t ask the slavers, the slavers would call the federalists anti-federalist, and those same slavers would call a patriot an insurgent. Well, you can listen to the slavers if you like, but they lie as a rule. If they did not lie, as a rule, their human trafficking businesses couldn’t be subsidized by the slaves, the slaves would know better than to dig their own graves to hell when told to do so with a smile on their faces, or else.

    I’d like to know the official facts, but that would require a trial by jury, a trial by the country, so that the people themselves, through their trial jury, can speak as one, so as to establish a fact that matters to everyone, rather than create a falsehood that matters to special interests, like slavers, who create legal fictions like National Interests.

    National Interest:
    http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*